After the 1st Amendment???

Ran across this one in the Washington Times…

WASHINGTON, December 4, 2013 — How far will President Obama go to control what we see and hear? How about removing First Amendment protections from FOX News or even from MSNBC, ABC, CNN, CBS or NBC. Maybe no free speech or freedom of the press for The Washington Times nor The Washington Post nor The New York Times or any other major media? Obama would justify it by claiming they are all tainted because they seek to profit from the news business.

Read the whole thing HERE
Going after the 1st Amendment rights for Hobby Lobby for ‘religious freedom’ by saying a for profit corporation does not have those rights…

If this gets through, how far behind will the thought police be on the web??? Especially if you have ‘ads’ on your site…

The more I see/hear about the crap this administration is pulling with ‘selective’ enforcement of laws, putting regulations in place with NO oversight, and the way things are being run (or not as the case may be)…

It literally raises the hairs on the back of my neck…  I thought Slick Willie was bad, but I’m beginning to believe BO is a PATHOLOGICAL NARCISSIST…

And the truly sad point is that everyone in the MSM is enabling him…  Regardless of the situation, it’s always about HIM, not about anyone else.  When you look at what got put out on the Mandela, in his little speech BO managed to reference Mandela eight times. His references to himself?  14 times…

He did the same thing on the Kennedy 50th…

If the administration gets ‘control’ of the media and the web where will we be???  I don’t have a good answer.  But I’ll bet we’ll all be charged with racism, or terrorism or something to shut us down…  And if they make those felonies???

There go the guns too…

 

Comments

After the 1st Amendment??? — 10 Comments

  1. “a PATHOLOGICAL NARCISSIST…”
    But of course. And surrounded by sycophants.
    If they don’t tell him that he has no clothes on,and the media doesn’t either, how could he ever make a well informed decision?
    You’re aware of Cannon (of Cato) and his comments regarding Obama’s lawlessness.
    I’ve heard commentators refer to him or interview him about everything he said, except armed insurrection.
    And I found that to be the most important point he made.

  2. OldNFO: You surprise me Mister! I would have expected such comments at least several years ago. To hear them now, I had to check the date on your post. Well, I guess catching on now is better than never. But Never, ever SUBMIT.

    Besides the CATO Institute reference, please check out josietheoutlaw.com and her message to the law enforcement community.

    Nothing to fear if we stand united. They can have them when they take them from my cold, dead hands.

  3. Newspapers/News Outlets not allowed to sell ads? Must work for free? Erm, I don’t think so. The second amendment was added to protect the first. Molon Labe.

  4. Ed- Yep…

    LL- THAT is what truly scares me…

    aguila- I’ve never been impressed, going back to 2008. I’ve never liked the man, but I respected the office. It’s how MUCH he’s ignoring, not only the Constitution, but the laws of the land that are truly pushing this country to the edge… First time I’ve seen the Josie clips, thanks!

  5. Scalps and coup must soon be collected.

    Sorry, my Pottawatomie heritage popping through.

  6. “If the administration gets ‘control’ of the media…”

    You mean more than they already have?

    Seriously, it is scary how much he’s getting away with. And what REALLY disturbs me is that no one – NO ONE! is standing up to him.

    Where’s the “loyal opposition”?