Another YGTBSM…

I’ve re-written this post about three times, trying to express my disgust without cussing…

Did you know the Bible, the Constitution, and the Declaration of Independence all promote sexism? And racism?

According to a course (required course mind you) being taught by DEOMI, under the auspices of the Department of Defense, they do!

Those three cherished texts all count as “historical influences that allow sexism to continue,” according to a presentation prepared by the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute, whose mission is to give a ”world-class human relations education.”

Screen-Shot-2015-04-07-at-10.45.54-AM

Make sure you take your BP meds before you go read the article by A.R. Goldenberg at the Daily Caller, HERE.

I can’t help but wonder who is the drafter of this program and what their background is… I can take a guess, as well as you probably can.

What really frosts me though, is that this crap is allowed to be spewed to the attendees as ‘gospel’… Or can I even say gospel?

The PC police and SJWs are alive, well and with administration top cover, ramming crap like this down our throats, while penalizing those who put courses together than could actually BENEFIT the warfighters…

But you can’t say radical islam, nor make any negative references to muslims, or even use DOCUMENTED actions… That’s ‘prejudicial’…

Gah… $%^&**&%%$$!!!

h/t AFCM

Comments

Another YGTBSM… — 22 Comments

  1. It’s straight out of the “Grievance Establishment” playbook. Color me “not shocked”.

  2. Just curious – is this an online course, or FTF? If the latter, can attendees speak out?

    You might also consider passing this on to your elected congresscritters, for all the good that would do. And of course, there’s the media (well, Fox News, maybe).

    The more they try to shove this crap down our throats, the more we should push back.

  3. People who promote this crap obviously don’t understand American history, or even the 3/5 compromise.
    Or perhaps they do…?
    Propagandistic bastards!

    gfa

  4. saw that article and did not read it. it just sounded to stupid, even for me.

  5. Usually you find a sick twisted freak at the bottom of stuff like this – likely a transgender type or a wanna-be.

  6. Political correctness run amok. It’s eating itself and has progressed from the merely weird to the limitedly academic to the absolutely satirical.

  7. What else can we expect from an “administration” that is “led” (from the far distant rear) by Mullah Obama who makes excuses for and apologizes to the assholes of radical Islam (I said that politically incorrect phrase, and I don’t give a solitary goddam if Obama doesn’t like it – I don’t like him either), but believes that the real terrorists of the world are Christians and Jews.

  8. GR6- That it does, and agreed!

    Tim/Ed- Apparently this is an ‘instructor led’ presentation….

    Rick- Yeah.

    Gfa/Rev- Oh they ‘know’ exactly what they are doing!

    Randy- It’s out there… sigh

    LL- In full social justice warrior mode too!

    Paw- If ONLY this was satirical… sigh

    Scootie- Agree, to them WE are the problem…

    SA/Ed- Yep!

  9. Who knew the Social Justice Warriors were an actual unit in the Department of Defense? I couldn’t find out how much we are paying for the honor of being insulted from the DOD budget.

  10. I’m surprised that you guys are shocked by this. I heard “white men are responsible for all evil in the world” circa ’93 and “all men are rapists; most just haven’t been caught yet” in 2010. Both were by paid DoD spokespeople. DoD (at least the AF in general and USAFA in particular) has been buying Mikey Weinstein’s wares for years.

    One of you old timers will have to tell me what it was like before the daily Two Minutes of Hate.

  11. I’m surprised that nobody had noticed that the author of that tripe didn’t get their constitutional history right either. They cite the preamble as being written in 1776. Geesh

  12. And yet the first time in my life that I experienced true respect as a person was when I started hanging around with faithful Catholic men. Who also happened to be ex-military with a good knowledge of history and the the aforementioned 3 horrible influences.

  13. On one of the blogs embroiled in the Hugo controversy a poster
    declared that the real name of the SJWs should be Solial Justice
    Bullies. “They aren’t warriors.”

    Makes sense to me.

  14. OK, I see that they have jumped the shark on this one (well, they jumped some time back, but…..).

    They have committed several classic blunders.

    They are judging past actions with today’s morality.
    They are cherry-picking historical figures.
    They are using a single example when several religious texts have similar or identical examples.
    They are ignoring common usage of words historically for more modern ones.

    And around this tapestry of slanted information and supposition, they construct a man = bad, woman = good premise and, I would bet, would shout down anyone who pointed out the flaws in their reasoning.

    The Social Revenge Bullies (a more apt description of the SJW’s) will brook no dissent or engage in no actual honest discourse.

    Just yesterday, I had to point out that a facebook post claiming the police didn’t exist prior to slavery and was strictly for capturing slaves was a bunch of crap. It was so demonstrably wrong, the only reason I could think of for it was “the big lie”.