An Interesting perspective…

Interesting perspective (not exactly sure who authored
this)

The Democrat Party has become the Lawyers’ Party. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are lawyers. Bill Clinton and Michelle Obama are lawyers. John Edwards, the other former Democrat candidate for president, is a lawyer, and so is his wife, Elizabeth. Every Democrat
nominee since 1984 went to law school (although Gore did not graduate). Every Democrat vice presidential nominee since 1976, except for Lloyd Bentsen, went to law school. Look at the Democrat Party in Congress: the Majority Leader in each house is a lawyer.

The Republican Party is different. President Bush and Vice President Cheney were not lawyers, but businessmen. The leaders of the Republican Revolution were not lawyers. Newt Gingrich was a history professor; Tom Delay was an exterminator; and, Dick Armey was an economist. House Minority Leader Boehner was a plastic manufacturer, not a lawyer. The former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist is a heart surgeon.

Who was the last Republican president who was a lawyer? Gerald Ford, who left office 31 years ago and who barely won the Republican nomination as a sitting president, running against Ronald Reagan in 1976. The Republican Party is made up of real people doing real work.
The Democrat Party is made up of lawyers. Democrats mock and scorn men who create wealth, like Bush and Cheney, or who heal the sick, like Frist, or who immerse themselves in history, like Gingrich.

The Lawyers’ Party sees these sorts of people, who provide goods and services that people want, as the enemies of America . And, so we have seen the procession of official enemies, in the eyes of the Lawyers’ Party, grow.

Against whom do Hillary and Obama rail? Pharmaceutical companies, oil companies, hospitals, manufacturers, fast food restaurant chains, large retail businesses, bankers, and anyone producing anything of value in our nation.

This is the natural consequence of viewing everything through the eyes of lawyers. Lawyers solve problems by successfully representing their clients, in this case the American people. Lawyers seek to have new laws passed, they seek to win lawsuits, they press appellate courts to
overturn precedent, and lawyers always parse language to favor their side.

Confined to the narrow practice of law, that is fine. But it is an awful way to govern a great nation. When politicians as lawyers begin to view some Americans as clients and other Americans as opposing parties, then the role of the legal system in our life becomes
all-consuming. Some Americans become “adverse parties” of our very government. We are not all litigants in some vast social class-action suit. We are citizens of a republic that promises us a great deal of freedom from laws, from courts, and from lawyers.

Today, we are drowning in laws; we are contorted by judicial decisions; we are driven to distraction by omnipresent lawyers in all parts of our once private lives. America has a place for laws and lawyers, but that place is modest and reasonable, not vast and unchecked. When the most important decision for our next president is whom he will appoint to the Supreme Court, the role of lawyers and the law in America is too big.

When lawyers use criminal prosecution as a continuation of politics by other means, as happened in the lynching of Scooter Libby and Tom Delay, then the power of lawyers in America is too great. When House Democrats sue America in order to hamstring our efforts to learn what our enemies are planning to do to us, then the role of litigation in America has become crushing.

We cannot expect the Lawyers’ Party to provide real change, real reform, or real hope in America . Most Americans know that a republic in which every major government action must be blessed by nine unelected judges is not what Washington intended in 1789. Most Americans grasp that we cannot fight a war when ACLU lawsuits snap at the heels of our defenders. Most Americans intuit that more lawyers and judges will not restore declining moral values or spark the spirit of enterprise in our economy.

Perhaps Americans will understand that change cannot be brought to our nation by those lawyers who already largely dictate American society and business. Perhaps Americans will see that hope does not come from the mouths of lawyers but from personal dreams nourished by hard work. Perhaps Americans will embrace the truth that more lawyers with more power will only make our problems worse.

The differance now is that the current crop of politicians have not, by and large, served in military. They have absolutely no respect for either the people or the institution of the military.

To them, the serviceman is an adjunct to the reelection campaign and adds credibility to the political person’s claim to “patriotism”. I believe that this great nation is at risk – not from without but from within; to me that risk transcends political parties, arising from the general indifference to facts, truth and more importantly, the lack of willingness to take an unpopular position even when it is the right thing to do.

My advice to all is to read the Constitution which we have all sworn to defend and protect and act accordingly. Look beyond the 30 second sound bites, find out what the candidates REALLY stand for and vote accordingly.

I really don’t care WHO you vote for, but I gave 22 years defending your right TO vote, so get your asses out there on Nov 7th…

Comments

An Interesting perspective… — 12 Comments

  1. The differance now is that the current crop of politicians have not, by and large, served in military. They have absolutely no respect for either the people or the institution of the military.

    I’ve been thinking about this a lot, lately. We are nearing the end of people who served because the “had” to serve (I realize that even with a draft, people enlisted).

    I know that apathy arises within the ranks with forced service; however, how can we get politicians who have respect for what the military does from a “been there” perspective? Our respect for our country in general is seen most in areas where people have little contact with those who serve.

  2. RT- I don’t have a good solution either- With the slash and burn mentality in politics today, no sane person would even want to run.
    Ev- that is a pretty damning set of circumstancial evidence.

  3. Our respect for our country in general is seen most in areas where people have little contact with those who serve.

    I meant that respect is seen most in regions where people have a lot of contact with the military.

    (My brain and my hands aren’t communicating well this weekend.)

  4. I knew about the Federal Reserve and income tax stuff, but I worked for a bank and my work got sent to the Fed every day, so I kind of had to know that stuff.

    I learned about the income tax stuff mentioned in high school.

  5. Drowning in laws, the prisons are afloat with felons. And if you want to know what justice is compare the sentences of white collar crime and common drug dealing thugs…

    No angels, and not enough real innocents but something is wrong – why is it a crime to carry a weapon? Into a school? Where I learned marksmanship? from my favorite History teacher?

    Democrats are lawyers, interesting.

  6. I have nothing to say that hasn’t been said already, but I found this post to be very straight to the point. Hopefully it will open some eyes. Thanks.