Oh @#$^&…

Well, I guess everyone has heard Sonia Sotomayor has been nominated as the replacement for Souter on SCOTUS

All this has done is reaffirm, at least in my mind, the Lightbringer doesn’t care a flip about the Constitution and is simply trying to stack the deck as much as he can! She is an average Judge, no really tough cases (she wouldn’t even hear the Reverse Discrimination case by Ricci et al over the firefighter promotions, which is now at SCOTUS), she is definitely anti-gun, anti-2A, and is going to get confirmed anyway because the Dems have enough votes to put her on the court without any problems…

BUT, she is female, Hispanic, Liberal, and has a sob story background- That puts all the checks in the box for the Obamabots, so who cares whether or not she is really the best candidate? They sure as hell don’t!

You can go HERE and read some of her statements and see the video of HER view of what the appeals courts do. You can go over to Texas Fred and read his post with leads to other posts/blogs.

Folks, this is, in my opinion, the first shot across the bows of the silent majority. I think the Obamabots are going to see what they can get away with on this one… How far they can push the envelope, how well the dems actually perform to get her on the SCOTUS, and prime the pump because the Lightbringer thinks he’ll get to do this again and again…

I’m writing my Congresscritters, asking them to look at qualifications and agendas of this woman, because I STRONGLY believe she will hurt the US more than help it…

What you do is up to each of you, but I simply ask you to consider whether you really want someone like this interpreting/making your laws for the next 20-30 years…

Or would you rather have someone like Justice Diane Wood? If you want a female, why not get one of the best? sigh…

Banging head on soapbox now…

Comments

Oh @#$^&… — 9 Comments

  1. I am just going to shoot myself so I don’t have to watch anymore of this shit! Virtually anyone with half a brain can see where this is going and I can’t stand it. Where are all the LHO’s when you need one?

  2. Some of this woman’s rulings are idiotic. She obviously considers herself above-the-law, and has promised to legislate from the bench.

  3. I didn’t read anywhere that a woman had to be nominated – but then I wasn’t asked was I?

    wv oustr so true….

  4. Am I wrong in thinking all judges are lawyers? That being a Supreme Court Justice is the acme of lawyerhood? That the majority of Congress are lawyers? Not to mention the POTUS is a lawyer? That these kinds of nominations validate all the lawyer jokes? Naw, must be something wrong with my thinking.

  5. She isn’t a jurist and never has been. She’s a political activist who uses her office to pursue a personal agenda.

    Reminds me of the story about a lawyer asked a legal question. He replied, “What do you want the answer to be?”

  6. Ev- I don’t know, but I wish they’d show up…

    Drjim- AGREED!!! dammit…

    Earl- Of course we weren’t asked… we’re beneath their level so don’t count!

    WSF- Not anymore than mine… 🙂

    Crucis- TRUE!!!

    Fuzzy- Yeah, she’s “real” good…

  7. Shipmate,
    You and I have far more significant backgrounds than judge sotomayor. We can prove it because our service records say so.
    GM Cassel
    AMH1(AW)
    USN
    Retired