It’s all about the money…

Talking with a friend at lunch yesterday, I found out he’s retiring early. It seems his company lost the contract for support to another company that underbid them by a considerable amount, even though they’ve been the incumbents for 15 years, and done an outstanding job.

Said company apparently has no footprint in the area, and is ‘offering’ to keep some of the folks on for a ‘minor’ pay cut of 30%…

This is yet another fallout of sequestration that isn’t apparent to folks outside government, but it’s costing people their jobs and in some cases ending long term relationships with various governmental organizations.

He’s in the ‘know’ so to speak, and said the direction from the powers that be was money was the driving force in the selection process. NOTHING else! Apparently said company was judged to be minimally qualified in all areas, where his company was rated outstanding in all areas… But MONEY!!!

Some fairly significant programs have effectively been shut down by this logic, as people who can do the jobs required are apparently not willing to take the pay cuts, nor or they willing to ‘extend’ for a month or two to train their replacements (who apparently in some cases have NO experience).

I’m also hearing the government is now apparently capping pay individuals can earn as contractors/consultants at the equivalent of a fully-loaded GS-15, ($170835) which seems like a lot until you start figuring out the various rates/calculations that go into contracted labor rates.  Pretty much a standard multiplier is 2.0-2.5% so dividing by .23 yields a rate of $74276, which is significantly less than the $130000 range most of the very senior/experienced PHD contractors make. I can’t think of many folks who are willing to take an almost 50% pay cut to continue to work in these highly stressful jobs. I’ve also heard of at least six PHDs that I personally know that have left government to return to academia sighting the pressures and ‘unrealistic’ expectations of management in the last two years.

If you really want to get down in the weeds, HERE is a Project on Government Oversight (POGO) report from 2013.

Much of the contracting lies at the feet of Bill Clinton, who ‘cut’ the size of the federal government by cutting positions (inside the government), which were immediately turned into contractor positions at 1.5-2.0 times the salary in the next weeks.

Realistically, due to the cuts in active duty military personnel, and reductions in workforce structure inside the government to ‘try’ to comply with personnel costs, there is no workable path forward for the Defense Department to functionally manage the levels of complexity today. We’ve all seen the cost over-runs, the contracting nightmares, etc. Why do they occur?

Simple- When you only pay for a mid-grade contracts specialist, and an even lower grade analyst, you don’t get the quality of personnel to actually MANAGE large, sometimes multi-billion dollar projects. And when you only have three or four people to ‘monitor’ two-four projects that large, what do you think happens?

The contractors have entire TEAMS of accountants and lawyers doing that billing and oversight. They’re going to bill everything allowable under the contract to the benefit of the contractor.

Of course all this is happening at the same time as entitlements continue to rise, and there doesn’t seem to be any ‘controls’ in place on that side of the contracting…

Funny isn’t it???

Comments

It’s all about the money… — 17 Comments

  1. “We’ve all seen the cost over-runs, the contracting nightmares, etc.”

    Can you say F-35…?

    Seriously, I never understood how Clinton got away with that whole cut-employees-hire-contracters-for-more-money thing, except that the media doesn’t do their job any more.

    And yeah, you’re 100% right about the lack of controls on the entitlement side.

  2. It isn’t just in government where this sort of thing is happening. It’s happening in the private sector as well. “Cost uber ales” rules nowadays. A long established vendor can be underbid by as little as a half percent, and they might lose the contract regardless of their longevity or work quality.

    I think a lot of this is brought on by the quarterly bonus cycle that is so common today. This in turn causes short-term thinking in managers. Of course managers are here today, gone tomorrow. It’s the rank and file employees who suffer the most.

  3. Remember there are two tiers in the accounting and cost game. The big 7 don’t have to play by the same rules as everyone else. So if your a sub to the L&M or General Dynamics, you carry the burden and oversight of both Uncle and the prime with much less benefits.

  4. At least, the outfit that underbid your friend’s company knows what their product is worth.

  5. It sounds like the OCONUS car shipping fiasco last summer. AAL had the contract for many years and did a good job. But some Johnny-come-latelys called IAL underbid. They seriously f’ed up PCS season last year. In reviewing all of this, TRANSCOM, in their wisdom, has given them 2 additional weeks to deliver cars. They don’t want the new contractor to look bad, so they rewarded them for doing a bad job.

  6. Sigh. Many of us who support major cuts in government also understand that contracting to the public sector isn’t always the solution simply because their bottom line is how much money they can clear. It’s way more complicated than just slash/don’t slash.

  7. WSF- Smart man!

    Gerry- Good point! Dammit…

    Scottie- Yeah, but who’s going to suffer?

    JMI- Yeah, we watched that with disbelief!

    PH- True, but it’s even worse when it’s disproportionately on the .mil side…

  8. I’m gonna go out on a limb and say the prime who f**ked up has the initials M and L (not necessarily in that order).

  9. gee! you guys are well informed. i’ve never heard of most of what you have discussed.
    this website is a way to get an idea of what’s going on.

    what i want to know is where do the clintons and their ilk keep the kickbacks. i guess they have offshore accounts?

    they are the first presidential family to build a facility for their bodyguards on their property and charge the government rent for it.

    they have figured how to get the $$ coming and going, no matter how immoral.

    i expect politicians to be greedy but you can only have so many fleas on a dog before the dog dies from lack of blood.

    i also wonder what currency or metal the clintons have in their stashes, wherever they keep them. i wonder if it is yuans, swiss francs or krugerrands.

  10. Stretch- Actually no… 8A set aside…

    Rick- Yep

    Deb- Damn good question, and no answers here. 🙁

  11. It could be because I was both a Soldier and a Contractor doing the same job, logistics automation support, and while I am getting ~GS-12 pay, for doing E4-6 work, it is often cheaper to send the Contractor to do the work.

    Not only because most e4-6 dont have almost 20 years of experience supporting the systems, but because we can head out and fix problems without many layers of permission.

    When I was in Germany, when there was problems calls outside of the Kasern(think small post) we were on, the Soldiers need to get CO’s permission and often if it was for support in outside of Germany(Belgium/Poland/Italy were most common) it would take weeks of sign offs and approvals for a group, soldiers cant travel alone, before they can be in route to fix the issues, Contractors on the other hand, can be inroute in minutes, if not the next day.

    Over all on a per solution cost Contractors were cheaper.