Interesting…

Apparently they’ve updated the slides since I saw this two years ago…

Granted this is an Army slide, but the Navy has the EXACT one in it’s briefing deck.

ClintonThreat

Full article HERE. And before you have kittens, she IS a security threat, as anyone who has ever had levels of access know.

If any of ‘us’ had ever done anything like what she has, we would already be in jail and looking at 20 to life, depending on which program(s) had been compromised.

What I still don’t understand is why the FBI and DOJ didn’t go after whomever moved the TS/SCI material off the respective machines. That in and of itself is a long prison sentence in and of itself…

Comments

Interesting… — 17 Comments

  1. Why the FBI and DO(I)J did not go after the whomever?
    Simple. “Things are DIFFERENT when you are a dimocrat”
    Laws do not apply to you. Regulations are for “others”.
    Rules are for little people.
    Remember beware of the “Alt Right” They be’s dangerous.

  2. You need to read the manual one more time…”all pigs are equal but some are more equal than others”.

    And what happened to the pigs who threatened Napoleon? — the dogs killed them. In this case it’s flying monkeys but the point is made.

    I wonder if they’ll change the briefing slide if she becomes commander in chief (and leader of the free world)?

  3. Yeah, if I’d compromised ONE of the 20K+ pieces of material that she did, they’d have locked me under Leavenworth,lost the key, and fed me rice and fish heads for the rest of my life.

  4. After she becomes president, there will probably be an “accidental” nuclear weapon go off on Fox News and Brieibart along with Judicial Watch.

  5. Jeez !!! Back in my time in the Air Force during the mid 60’s so much energy went into maintaining Security that I think it’d be fitting for a JURY of my peers to decide HER fate. After all we’re in her “age group”.

  6. Roger/Rev/WSF- Don’t give her any ideas!!!

    Woody- Agreed! That is ONE jury I’d volunteer for!

  7. Hillary’s threat is worse because she also set policy as Secretary of State. Her policies were horrible, especially those in the Mideast, and her email system was a sieve of information to Russia or China. That is far worse in my book than a Snowden or a Petraeus.

  8. I wonder if THEY realized what’s in store for them when we decide to no longer follow the law.
    Also wonder if any of THEM know what a tumbrel is.

  9. Not trying to be a jerk or anything, but I think you’re taking a simplistic view of what the FBI did. Most Important Point: She was not acquitted, the decision was to not prosecute (which means they can always prosecute later).

    If she had been arrested, what do you think discovery would have looked like? Where would you find that many cleared lawyers that Clinton would accept on her team? Who else would have been a co-conspirator? She sent and received literally thousands of e-mails that were very obviously not to/from a dot gov domain. This is a crime. I’d bet that pretty much the entire executive branch would have been indicted, if they indicted Hillary – and that includes Obama. The FBI simply cannot do this. On top of all that, she’s the Dem nominee for President. The FBI would have looked like political hacks if they indicted her. At some point it would look like a RICO charge against the executive branch would be appropriate (I think it would, but this would seriously undermine our government). It just isn’t feasible, or wise, to arrest the top half of the State department, most of our ambassadors, a good chunk of the senior staff at the White House, and a few hundred SES’s and GS-15’s. The wheels would come off.