The WAPO and other MSM are blaming the bombing on Trump, and defacto blaming him for the synagog shooting in Pittsburgh yesterday, claiming ‘they’ have the moral high ground, because they are ‘honest’ reporters. One of the claims yesterday on cable was that the President has radicalized more people than ISIS…
But if you go back and look at when Steve Scalise was shot, even though the shooter was an admitted and avowed Bernieite, you never saw THAT in a headline.
As an OBTW, Trump’s daughter is married to a Jew, has converted to Judaism, and he has Jewish grandchildren. Kinda hard to say he’s anti-Jewish.
I would just ask this question of the WAPO/NY Times, and other MSM outlets- How clean are your hands? What is the actual slant of most of your stories concerning either the President or Republicans? Hint- Over 80% negative/provocative in nature.
Have your stories played up or played down violence between various groups, and what slant is seen on those stories?
What do many of your talking heads/pundits continue to insinuate on a daily basis? Peace and love, balanced reporting, or ???
Are your articles for or against the military?
The common people/flyover country?
And the list goes on…
There is some pushback, HERE, from S. Sanders on the President and First Lady visiting Pittsburgh tomorrow.
I’m about to the point that anything I read in the papers or see on the MSM, I pretty much believe the opposite is going to be the truth… sigh…