I LIKE this idea…

When a company falls on difficult times, one of the things that seems to happen is they reduce  their staff and workers. The remaining workers must find ways to continue to do a good job or risk that their job would be eliminated as well.

Wall Street and the media normally congratulate the CEO for making this type of “tough decision”,  and the board of directors gives upper corporate  management  big bonuses..

Our government should NOT be immune from similar risks.

Therefore:

Reduce the House of Representatives from the current435 members to 218  members.


Reduce Senate members from100  to 50 (one per State). Then, reduce their remaining staff  by 25%.

Accomplish this over the next 8 years (two  steps/two elections) and of course this would require some  redistricting.

Some Yearly Monetary Gains Include:

$44,108,400 for elimination of  base pay for congress. (267 members X $165,200 pay/member/  yr.)

$437,100,000 for elimination of their staff.  (Estimate $1.3 Million in staff per each member of the House, and $3 Million in staff per each member of the Senate every  year)

$108,350,000 for the reduction in remaining staff  by 25%.

$7,500,000,000reduction in pork barrel earmarks each  year. (Those members whose jobs are gone. Current estimates for total government pork earmarks are at$15  Billion/yr).

The remaining representatives would need to work smarter and  improve efficiencies.. It might even be in their best interests to  work together for the good of our country!

We may also expect that smaller committees might lead to a more efficient resolution of issues as well. It might even be easier to keep track of what your representative is doing.

Congress has more tools available to do their jobs than it had back in 1911 when the current number of representatives was established. (Telephone, computers, cell phones to name a few)

Note:
Congress does not  hesitate to head home for extended weekends, holidays and  recesses, when what the nation needs is a real fix for  economic problems. Also, we had 3 senators who were not doing their jobs for the 18+ months (on the campaign trail) and still they all accepted full pay. Minnesota survived very well with only one senator for the first half of a year. These facts alone support a reduction in senators and congress.

Summary:

$44,108,400  reduction of congress members.

$282,100,000 elimination of the reduced house member staff.

$150,000,000 elimination of reduced senate member staff.

$70,850,000  for 25% reduction of staff for remaining house  members.

$37,500,000  for 25% reduction of staff for remaining senate  members.

$7,500,000,000  reduction in pork added to bills by the reduction of congress  members.

$8,084,558,400  per year, estimated total savings. (That’s 8-BILLION just to start!)

Corporate   America does these types of cuts all the time.There’s even  a name for it — “Downsizing.”
——————————
Also, if Congresspersons were required to serve 20, 25 or 30 years (like everyone else) in order to collect retirement benefits, taxpayers could save a bundle.

Now they get full retirement after serving only ONE term.

Comments

I LIKE this idea… — 19 Comments

  1. Additionally – Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators or Representatives, and Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators or Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States.

  2. I’m good with that..and force them all to use that nifty new insurance plan that they created for the rest of us, too. No more gold-plated Congressional medical plan–they should be the first people signed up for Obamacare.

  3. It’s a good idea. I’m for tar and feathering a few of the remaining to keep them interested.

  4. Why do I doubt the Congress critters will amend the Constitution to make this legal?

    Gerry

  5. +1 to all of the above! $8 billion is only two days’ spending for the fed.gov … but it’s a start. 🙂

  6. Great posting and comments…I cannot improve on them I do like the idea of part time legislatures….we have that in GA, we keep the crooks in session for 40 days only. During the 40 days they have to prioritize what they pass for the governor to sign..so all the bs bills never make it to the floor for a vote. The flipside of the 40 days…it is hard to find hookers in Atlanta…it seems that they are busy.

  7. Too Bad the only way to make those kind of Changes is to call the Constitutional Convention. Remember that scene from Mel Brooks’ “History of the World, Part One” where the Roman Senate is in Session?

  8. No retirement unless they work 20 years, otherwise, just a one time severance package. Or just have one four year term for Congressmen and two terms for a Senator with no retirement.