More on 3D printing…

Now the Army is getting into the act…

But thanks to a joint Picatinny Arsenal and Aberdeen Proving Ground Army Research Laboratory project, the Army can now provide manufacturers with part specifications in an interactive 3D format that can be easily read by modern machines.
The goal was to replace 2D PDFs with new versions that include a 3D visualization and the product manufacturing data.
In fact, they Army went beyond 3D: While the new TDPs include every detail about the part, the document didn’t have any information on how to make it.
The team has created not just a 3D TDP, but also incorporated a step-by-step guide to how specific tools can be used to make the necessary parts.


Full article HERE

And then there is the ‘Cuomo Clip’ from Defense Distributed…

But the laws are at least one step behind technology. Using 3D printers and schematics available on the Internet, gun owners can manufacture a fully functional, plastic magazine clip. Plans are free, although getting access to a 3D printer may prove expensive, at least for now.

“If you can download it, you can have it.”

– Cody Wilson, Defense Distributed/Wiki Weapons Project
“If you can download it, you can have it,” said University of Texas law student Cody Wilson, who is part of Defense Distributed, a group that has created the design for what they refer to as a “Cuomo Clip” along with other gun parts. It is all under an initiative they refer to as the Wiki Weapon Project.

/snip/

Rep. Steve Israel, D-N.Y., has called for amending the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988, which initially sought to ban guns that could be sneaked through metal detectors, to include a ban on “homemade, 3-D printed, plastic high-capacity magazines.”
“Congress passed a law banning plastic guns for two decades when they were just a movie fantasy,” Israel told FoxNews.com. “With the advent of 3-D printers, these guns are suddenly a real possibility, and the law Congress passed is set to expire this year.

“We should act now to give law enforcement authorities the power to stop the development of these weapons before terrorists and criminals can easily bring them on planes. We need to be proactive and keep ahead of the technology. When the legislation was originally passed in 1988, no one would have imagined that parts of a gun and a magazine could be made with a printer — imagine what the technology will be even five years down the road.”


Full article HERE.


So is the ‘next’ ban on 3D printers??? Or certain types of plastic for 3D printers???  Or will you have to sign your life away to get that plastic (like we do today for Sudafed)???


   

Comments

More on 3D printing… — 7 Comments

  1. The 911 Hijackers carried box cutters onto the aircraft with the permission of security.

    And in regard to Airport Security, is there any agency of the government more populated with mouth-breathers and fools than TSA? — ok, maybe GSA.

    Legislation does not equal safety from bad people. Only safety from good people.

  2. You know, any decent Sheet Metal Shop could make this a Moot Point. Remember, the Dutch made STEN guns under the noses of the Nazis in Bicycle Shops during the Occupation, and the Israelis made Ammo out of Lipstick Cases during the War of Independence.

  3. I don’t see the need to run out and buy a 3D TDP printer…unless the technology has been introduced to the porn industry.

    I guess there is some need for legislation in order to have some kind of written guidelines, but as LL said, it will be only for the good people. The bad guys are already working on go-around’s for this, too.

  4. How long will we continue to expect something resembling intelligence from those we already know don’t have any? Mob psychology runs rampant in legislatures and capitols in general.

    They never fail to underachieve or otherwise act stunningly stupid.

  5. LL- Your point is well made, and don’t forget DHS in general…

    Les- Oh yeah…

    Alan- 🙂

    CP- Yep…

    WSF- Agree!

    Rev- Until they are replaced by ‘citizen’ legislators, rather than ‘professional’ legislators??? I dunno…