Um… Aren’t we already basically doing this???
h/t JP
Um… Aren’t we already basically doing this???
h/t JP
What’s really sad is I had to get this from the UK, NOT from US media… (Article HERE)
Bülent Arınç, the deputy prime minister, said the second plane had been attacked as it flew above the Mediterranean searching for two pilots. The claim undermines Damascus’s insistence that mistaken identity caused the attack on the first jet.
Turkey has called a meeting of the National Atlantic Council, Nato’s political steering body made up of ambassadors from member states, under the article four of the North Atlantic treaty, which allows any member to consult its allies whenever it believes “the territorial integrity, political independence or security of any of the parties is threatened”.
Now THIS is where it gets interesting, since the US is a member of the NAC… One wonders how the administration is going to handle this hot potato…
From Fox, the following was written by JD Gordon. The whole article is HERE
He’s the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, founded in 1928 as a Fascist Islamic political party. The are avowed goal is to instill the Qur’an and Sunnah as the “sole reference point for ordering the life of the Muslim family, individual, community and state”.
They are fundamentalist to put it mildly (and small by comparison), and it will be interesting to see if they can actually get support from the myriad of parties and liberals, moderates and other factions in Egypt.
In the mean time, this could be a significant problem for the US, especially with respect to the Suez Canal, and free movement of our military and contract ships through the canal…
I don’t think this one is over by a long shot, and I’m still waiting for the military to decide where they are going to come down on this, and whether or not they will ‘reassume’ control of Egypt.
In the mean time, security for the whole region is up in the air… I’d be keeping an eye on this one, because if this breaks truly bad, the Israelis may have yet another war on their hands (again) much closer than Iran…
This is an interesting approach to the parties, and I’d never thought of it in this way, but it DOES make sense!!!
The Lawyers’ Party,
By Bruce Walker
The Democratic Party has become the Lawyers Party.
Barack Obama is a lawyer. Michelle Obama is a lawyer.
Hillary Clinton is a lawyer. Bill Clinton is a lawyer.
John Edwards is a lawyer. Elizabeth Edwards was a lawyer.
Every Democrat nominee since 1984 went to law school (although Gore did not graduate).
Every Democrat vice presidential nominee since 1976, except for Lloyd Bentsen, went to law school.
Look at leaders of the Democrat Party in Congress:
Harry Reid is a lawyer. Nancy Pelosi is a lawyer.
The Republican Party is different.
President Bush is a businessman.
Vice President Cheney is a businessman.
The leaders of the Republican Revolution:
Newt Gingrich was a history professor.
Tom Delay was an exterminator.
Dick Armey was an economist.
House Minority Leader Boehner was a plastic manufacturer.
The former Senate Majority Leader Bill First is a heart surgeon.
Who was the last Republican president who was a lawyer? Gerald Ford, who left office 31 years ago and who barely won the Republican nomination as a sitting president, running against Ronald Reagan in 1976. The Republican Party is made up of real people doing real work, who are often the targets of lawyers.
The Democrat Party is made up of lawyers. Democrats mock and scorn men who create wealth, like Bush and Cheney, or who heal the sick, like First, or who immerse themselves in history, like Gingrich. The Lawyers Party sees these sorts of people, who provide goods and services that people want, as the enemies of America .. And, so we have seen the procession of official enemies, in the eyes of the Lawyers Party, grow.
Against whom do Hillary and Obama rail?….Pharmaceutical companies, oil companies, hospitals, manufacturers, fast food restaurant chains, large retail businesses, bankers, and anyone producing anything of value in our nation. This is the natural consequence of viewing everything through the eyes of lawyers. Lawyers solve problems by successfully representing their clients, in this case the American people. Lawyers seek to have new laws passed, they seek to win lawsuits, they press appellate courts to overturn precedent, and lawyers always parse language to favor their side.
Confined to the narrow practice of law, that is fine. But it is an awful way to govern a great nation. When politicians as lawyers begin to view some Americans as clients and other Americans as opposing parties, then the role of the legal system in our life becomes all-consuming. Some Americans become adverse parties of our very government. We are not all litigants in some vast social class-action suit. We are citizens of a republic that promises us a great deal of freedom from laws, from courts, and from lawyers.
Today, we are drowning in laws; we are contorted by judicial decisions; we are driven to distraction by omnipresent lawyers in all parts of our once private lives. America has a place for laws and lawyers, but that place is modest and reasonable, not vast and unchecked. When the most important decision for our next president is whom he will appoint to the Supreme Court, the role of lawyers and the law in America is too big.
When House Democrats sue America in order to hamstring our efforts to learn what our enemies are planning to do to us, then the role of litigation in America has become crushing.
Perhaps Americans will understand that change cannot be brought to our nation by those lawyers who already largely dictate American society and business. Perhaps Americans will see that hope does not come from the mouths of lawyers but from personal dreams nourished by hard work. Perhaps Americans will embrace the truth that more lawyers with more power will only make our problems worse.
The United States has 5% of the world’s population and 66% of the world’s lawyers! Tort (Legal) reform legislation has been introduced in congress several times in the last several years to limit punitive damages in ridiculous lawsuits such as spilling hot coffee on yourself and suing the establishment that sold it to you and also to limit punitive damages in huge medical malpractice lawsuits. This legislation has continually been blocked from even being voted on by the Democrat Party. When you see that 97% of the political contributions from the American Trial Lawyers Association go to the Democrat Party, then you realize who is responsible for our medical and product costs being so high!
While I don’t necessarily agree with ALL the points, he does make some good ones… And one case in point is Angelos the owner of the Orioles and a lawyer, he made an estimated $100 million off the asbestos suits, when the average claimant got less than $2000. His ‘claim to fame’ is class action suits, and the majority of the $$ go to him, not the members of the class action… sigh…
It’s not often you see the pilots come out of the cockpit grinning… Just sayin…
And one more just for S&Gs…
And my body clock is totally hosed, so I’m going to slee zzzZZZZ…
It’s not just people in the USA that are that gullible…
Sigh… 🙂
|
|