About that privacy…

You ‘thought’ you had…

Remember how criminal fingerprint bases were kept separate from military and civil (e.g. fingerprinted for a job)?

Yeah, not so much anymore…

I completely missed this one, but it came out in a discussion of the latest release of the ever increasing scope of the OPM hack (an additional 6 million files hacked, PLUS all fingerprints).

This from the EFF-

FBI Combines Civil and Criminal Fingerprints into One Fully Searchable Database

Being a job seeker isn’t a crime. But the FBI has made a big change in how it deals with fingerprints that might make it seem that way. For the first time, fingerprints and biographical information sent to the FBI for a background check will be stored and searched right along with fingerprints taken for criminal purposes.

The change, which the FBI revealed quietly in a February 2015 Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA), means that if you ever have your fingerprints taken for licensing or for a background check, they will most likely end up living indefinitely in the FBI’s NGI database. They’ll be searched thousands of times a day by law enforcement agencies across the country—even if your prints didn’t match any criminal records when they were first submitted to the system.

Full article HERE. What isn’t clear, but is included are ALL the military fingerprints, which we were told were always to be kept separately for security reasons…

Yeah, right… Shoulda known better…

You can read the Fibbies Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) HERE.

Think about it… How many doors, objects, etc. do you touch on a daily basis when getting too/from work… The grab bar on the Metro, the bus, the door to the elevator, handrails? Bathroom doors? Restaurant doors at lunch?

Suppose there is an incident at a location you’ve been to, they dust and lo an behold your fingerprints show up…

You have a high security job, now how are you going to explain to YOUR security people why the cops just hauled you downtown for an ‘interview’…

But wait… It is going to get even better! For certain values of better…

Specifically, in 2012, Deputy Assistant Director Jerome Pender stated:

Only criminal mug shot photos are used to populate the national repository. Query photos and photos obtained from social networking sites, surveillance cameras, and similar sources are not used to populate the national repository.

But the new RFQ contradicts this because it appears the desired software would allow officers to submit non-mug shot photos to NGI. The RFQ says the FBI is looking for a mobile biometrics tool that would, “at a minimum . . . include fingerprints and facial photographs for submission and receipt of a response.” Photographs taken in the field are clearly not “mug shot photos” because they’re taken before booking and possibly even before arrest. And it’s hard to see how a mobile tool that allows officers to collect these non-mug shot photos and “submit” them to a database is not also “populating the national repository.”

The article from EFF is HERE. And HERE’s the link to the FedBizOps page for the biometric system…

Yep, kiss that whole privacy thing good by… As if we had any to start with…

h/t Lawdog

Comments

About that privacy… — 17 Comments

  1. You focus on loss of privacy – a valid concern, but I’m more concerned with abuse of the data, and it may not be only our government committing that abuse. (Does Berlitz teach Mandarin?)

  2. I think that driver’s license photos were the first non-criminal photos to be incorporated – once digitized, it’s an easy process. Add military ID photos, and it’s a very short step to sucking down Facebook and Twitter.

  3. Alien- I have NO doubt the Chinese are getting everything, and probably passing it to the Soviets…

    LL- Agreed. My question is, at what point is the presumption of innocence lost???

  4. Sorry NFO, the presumption of innocence has already been lost.

  5. Ever seen the TV show ‘Person Of Interest’?
    Sci-Fi, right?

    OH, we are headed that way, my friend!

    gfa

  6. There is no presumption of innocence any longer. We’re all “potential home-grown terrorists”, anyway. (grumble, grumble, mutter)

  7. gfa- No, actually I haven’t…

    Rev- Well, true if you’re active/ex/retired military… Dammit…

  8. Eek. That is all I have to say anymore about our government doings.

  9. Public places are garbage for fingerprints – yes, YOU touched that handle, but so did Urist McGreasyPaws and half a million other clowns.

    In a pinch, there’s always gloves.

  10. So maybe now that I got a CCW, I can finally go back to work? It’s not just a matter of being obsolete? Want a coke and fries with that?

  11. Pingback: Just When You Thought It Was Safe, Part III… | Guffaw in AZ

  12. Pingback: FBI combined criminal, military, civil background check fingerprint data before OPM hack