This is truly abominable… Putting money over safety and life!
In an extraordinary speech synthesizing several “headline” discoveries from analyses of thousands of Pfizer documents, Dr. Naomi Wolf presented how the COVID “vaccine” enterprise intentionally sought to not only “disrupt and impair human reproduction” but “attack” and “kill” large numbers of people, particularly in the West.
Full article, HERE.
If this is true, a LOT of folks at Pfizer, CDC, DOD, etc. should be in fear for their lives…
I’m…just going to leave it at that.
Yes…. the entire purpose of the vaccine was to introduce a poison that would thin the herd. The criminals in power didn’t even TRY to hide what they were doing and why. People like evil Bill Gates has OPENLY STATED that using vaccines to cut way back on the population was a laudable goal. Anyone paying attention should have seen this coming. And they aren’t through. COUNT on another “plannedemic” and more faux vaccines.
If true? Where have you been for the last two years? This was a purposeful genocidal event the likes of which we have never seen, and the effects of which we may not fully see for decades. Crimes against humanity is the only way to put it, and the only way it should be treated.
I’ll pile on; “if true”? It is beyond doubt!
Crimes against humanity, aye!
Hangings are in order
If True? I am in with all of the previous commenters. I believe that the novel Corona Virus 2019 and the mRNA “vaccines” were designed as bio-weapons and because of some of the participants (CCP, Fauci, Gates, WEF, Pifzer, et al) is a Bond villain scheme to reduce population for their “Great Reset”.
I did (mistakenly) take the J&J jab which has been “outlawed”. The J&J was probably not the bio-weapon that Pifzer and Moderna jabs are so it has been discredited. I have taken nothing further and only will if “they” tie me down or sneak it into some other medication or food.
What they said above. The purpose mRNA (NOT a vaccine) was not to cure COVID. The purpose of COVID was to get you to take the mRNA.
“I’m…just going to leave it at that.”
Indeed. I’ll just refer to my comment from yesterday.
+1
I’m doing my part to get this information out to the public.
Does the information surprise me? Hell no!
I interviewed her assistant and right hand person, Amy Kelly, COO and Project Director at Dailyclout.io.
Amy managed the team that Steve Bannon of War Room and Dr. Naomi Wolf called for to analyze the Pfizer/FDA documents that Pfizer tried to hide.
We talked about the process and the content of the book they produced.
Damning stuff.
All- Understand your questioning my ‘if true’ statement. Yes, I believe it’s true, but I can’t confirm it via third party sources… sigh
Actually, the DailyClout.IO documents prove it.
Hey Old NFO;
This is targeting the West in my mind, The west is all about individual Freedom and where the individual is prized…that goes totally against the elitist who knows what is best for the rest of us “dirt people”. This helps thin the herd and get everyone in the proper mindset for more crackdowns in the future.
It was the “If” in “If True”? You know how you would say that with a little questioning in your voice, meaning that the story is apparently true. Hard to put down simiply in text.
My research on the net tells me that everything this woman is saying is the whole truth and nothing but the truth. There should be arrests made and an unlimited number of trials at the Hague for crimes against humanity with no appeals and the maximum penalty of death by public hanging. Arrest warrants should be issued for Biden, Gates, Fauchi, Boris Johnson, and many, many more. Justice must be served. These crimes cannot go unpunished if we are to be shown as a civilized society operating by the rule of law!
I began thinking quite some time ago that puzzle pieces fall into place very well.
Our government funds gain of function research in China.
China releases such a virus to the world and tries to short protective devices by holding them back for their own use.
Our government lies about preventive measures (masks for one) that don’t work.
Our government kills hundreds (thousands?) of small businesses and seriously cripples many larger ones, cumulatively tanking the economy.
Our government allows Pharma to release seriously under-tested drugs on the population with total immunity for any bad results.
When called on the fact that the drugs are not in fact what the government and Pharma claim them, to be (immunizations), the government changes the definition.
Oh yes, the pieces fall into place nicely. I have not been the least bit surprised at the number and severity of “side effects.” Perhaps the government would like to change the definition of that phrase, too.
Question is, WHO KNEW?
Intent is harder to prove.
Complex fragile plans are also harder to prove.
I think that including elements much harder to prove in lists of easily provable claims may open the lists of provable claims up to counter action.
The elements easy to prove are on their own sufficient to show that significant wrong doing occurred, that there was a great breach of trust by ‘experts’, and that the public has a serious right and duty to seek remedies and adjustments.
Forex, masking. These were obviously only functional at best as mechanical separators; From an understanding of mechanical separators and basic highschool biology, it is possible to show that they would have both serious costs and efficacy issues. Lockstep statements to the contrary are thus evidence of information war and malfeasance.
Forex, the claims both that lockdowns were preventing a potential one time death event on the order of 200k, and that ‘stopping’ at the very most 10k yearly shooting deaths was important enough to public health to be worth relaxing the lockdowns for those specific events. The ‘experts’ were necessarily lying about at least one of those things. Unless they understood frauding Biden in as a one time opportunity to reduce unjust shooting deaths. In which case they were stupid, evil, and criminally malicious.
It is very clear that medical professionals and bureaucracies overseeing and training them profoundly violated the public trust, and that this will need addressing in one way or another.
It is also very clear that there was, and probably still is, an extensive amount of information war being waged.
When I account for the contamination of what I ‘know’ by the info war, I do not know a very great number of things.
I do not know that covid-19 existed ever. All sources of information on that could be explained by information warfare and colds.
I do not know that any ‘vaccine’ ever actually existed. I have heard testimony that people have gotten shots, but I have never seen any of those shots myself. If I had, I am not sure that I could have distinguished the shot from saline. I may have seen a bad reaction to a shot. I certainly do not have any way of knowing first hand about widespread effects of shots.
The masking? I had enough information to do that analysis myself.
Likewise, I may not have seen the other claims being made in person, but I did look up a number, and do the analysis myself.
Third example, I was able to do this thinking myself. I also saw that there were many people who were speaking or demanding, and did not do all of this thinking on their own. That leaves me part way convinced that these people are undeserving of positions of trust or responsibility. Rote thinkers who obey mainstream media or academia are not really leadership material in my view.
There are clearly things seriously wrong.
If the harder to prove stuff can be proven, then do it while or after we are working to address the problems that we are certain of. The harder to prove stuff will take a lot of careful collection of evidence, and consideration of evidence.
Just the fact patterns that we can be certain of are daunting.
I would also cite the precedent of Henry Wirz. Who was accused of improperly imprisoning Americans, and of causing them to die of illness.
At the time, the pattern of claims about covid-19 were remarkably similar to a biowarfare agent, and the hypothesis that it was a de jure or de facto act of warfare by an enemy seems like it should have been plausible. The choices made by certain officials could be understood as providing aid and comfort to an enemy in time of war. IE, might fit the criteria for conviction of treason. If this evidence and accusation is sound, we have a long way to go to obtain the convictions and sentences.
BobtRF:
The patent office has records of work on this covid19. Fauci’s first patent on it was in ’98. His attempt to patent the vaxx was in ’06. Didn’t get it. They didn’t consider it to actually be a vaccine. No proof it worked or actually did anything beneficial.
That was the video of Dr David E. Martin presenting the patent trail of covid19 to a German commission. Not finding it elsewhere, so far.
All- Thank you for your thoughts. Bob- ‘Intent is harder to prove. Complex plans are also harder to prove.’ No kidding!!!
I believe the initial purpose for releasing Covid was to justify “mail in voting” to facilitate stealing the 2020 election which the left had zero chance of winning honestly. Using it to justify poisoning the populace was a bonus. It also allowed them to test and perfect many of their “control the population” schemes. This isn’t over. Thy haven’t achieved the 100% control they lust for. They have more schemes in the works. Probably scheduled for the beginning of next year to distract the weak minded from the NEXT massive dose of election fraud.