This raises even more questions about Tuesday night…
The Los Angeles Times has published a lavish puff piece hailing Linsey Davis, one of the moderators of ABC’s three-against-one Donald Trump-Kamala Harris debate Tuesday evening. And why not? With her yeoman service to Harris’ cause, Davis has become a rising star in the far-left propaganda machine known as the establishment media. Amid growing controversy over a whistleblower’s allegation that Harris received the questions beforehand, however, the Times revealed a good deal more than it intended.
Quick: who were the moderators of the Kennedy-Nixon debates in 1960? Or the moderators of the Gerald Ford-Jimmy Carter debate in 1976 when Ford promised the world that there would be no Soviet domination of Poland on his watch? How about the moderators of Ronald Reagan’s debate with Walter Mondale in 1984, the one where the Gipper turned the tables on the age issue and turned around his campaign? Can’t come up with any of them? That’s because they did their jobs, more or less impartially, and they knew they weren’t supposed to be the center of attention.
Full article, HERE.
I know this will fuel the ‘conspiracy theories’ out there, but it does make one wonder…
Especially if the allegations HERE are true…
Your thoughts?
I saw ABC’s official response to the allegations. They said “We did not give Harris the questions”. That is a much different statement than “We did not give the Harris campaign access to the questions nor did we accept any suggestions for questions from them.”
It is entirely possible that the Harris campaign supplied ABC with the questions. It is almost a certainty that a list of questions was floating around the ABC newsroom and somebody said “Golly, wouldn’t it be a shame if the Harris campaign got a copy so we could make this a better production.”
Or, Harris “just happened” to be supplied with “sample questions” that weren’t exactly identically worded as the real debate questions, but of substantially the same content, for plausible deniability.
I am going to wait and see how this pans out (ABC) , and give it some time.Funny though , I only made it for ten minutes viewing , but Kamala really never answered any of the questions , she’s like the old pull string GI Joes , that you pull the string and it repeats the same lines again and again . Unless she is hiding some brilliance , she comes off as a complete dumbshit . “Unburdened by what has been …this point in time…the passage of time..blah blah blah” it is grating on the nerves , like listening to a stoner that’s really really high . She thinks she is a female David Carradine doing Kwai Chang Caine , XANAX and wine is no way to go through life son… LOL
It’s the stupid Republicans fault. It happened before with both the questions and moderators openly being biased and helping the democrats, but every election cycle they think this time will be different. If Trump beats the vote cheat, he should kick the big three out of the press pool.
Charlie Brown. Lucy. Football.
X2
As a kid I used to think “how bad Lucy is”. Having grown up, I realize it it Charlie Brown’s fault for continuing to play in game he can’t win. All he had to do was stop enabling Lucy.
Similarly, the Republicans know they are going to go into a “debate” farce designed to make them look bad, but they keep doing it. I’ve wondered if it is because the swamp Republicans don’t want to win, but have to look like they are trying. (Send us money to oppose those “evil” Democrats.)
Look at the 2016 election. Jeb Bush was the swamp Republicans pick to be the nominee, and after he was the candidate, he’d then “gracefully lose” to Hillary. If by some unbelievable chance he won, he was still enough of a Uniparty creature to be controlled by them.
Fortunately, they miscalculated Trump’s chances, and he was elected President. At that point, the Uniparty combined to oppose him thru the whole of his Presidency, and insure he wasn’t reelected.
It’s called treason. There is no other description of attempting to overthrow the government.
It’s only treason if you lose. GW and crowd would have been hung for treason had they lost.
AAll- Thanks, and yes Ag, THAT is on the money…
This is another example of why the media-academia-government complex must be shattered. Media now barely tries to even mask that they are an arm of the movement to deny Americans their rights.
The left has only one rule. Win. By any means necessary. Of course the “debate” was rigged to favor Harris. Anyone believing otherwise is a fool. No matter how much you may hate the media…it isn’t enough.
I am late at commenting but it was clear the debate was 3 on 1 against Trump. Harris knew what the questions were ahead of time and was able to prep so she really did not come off as her “word salad” fool. Harris did not answer any questions or give up policy so nobody really knows anything about her.
In working out who won the debate the media was always going to say Harris, but Trump won it. He was not as clear as usual but he was against three. Trump came across angry, and he won on three points 1) the bit on Springfield Haitians eating the cats and dogs, 2) telling Harris to stop the debate go to DC with him get Biden awake and close the border as you do not need a bill, and 3) To Harris you have been in office for 3.5 years to implement your plans yet you haven’t why would people think you will?
On #1 this was turned into a music bite by a socialist and exploded on TicTok to millions who are know checking out the illegals flood by the US govt. Ohio Gov is sending National Guard and millions in help to Springfield and this is getting Legacy Media attention.
On #2 and #3 the Undecided and Independents not yet in for a candidate looked at this and are breaking for Trump. In PA Harris has been forced to give her first solo interview and it was worse then the debate.