Really???

Welp. the WNBA front office has been heard from…

“We embrace justice equity, diversity, and inclusion,” the statement read. “Those are the values that unite this Union and allow it to protect women’s sports while creating transformational change. Hate, abuse, and demonization of any person or group of people, including transgender people, only fuel fear, division, and harm. We will continue to have hard conversations. But we will not be used as political pawns.”

Full article, HERE from Fox News.

If you call a non-answer an answer…

But, IMHO, it’s a ‘little’ late to be talking about being political pawns…

By their own actions, they became political pawns a couple of years ago. And now that they have been backed into a corner, I don’t think they have any idea what to do, now that their BS has been called!

I bought more popcorn today, and now I’m glad I did!!!

And then there is ‘this’ little faux pas by DiJonai Carrington HERE, and her immediately screaming racism…

And let’s not talk about cultural appropriation with the blonde hair, or the fact that she is ‘known’ to be a dirty player, much like Wilson from the Las Vegas team.

Seems like she doesn’t like being ‘called’ and made accountable for her actions, that she brought on herself!!!


Comments

Really??? — 7 Comments

  1. The WNBA beclowned itself while expecting that a circus wouldn’t break out.

    Y’all got any more of that popcorn?

  2. Don’t kid yourselves. WNBA is enjoying all the attention. Nay, they’re encouraging all the attention. More than they’ve had in their existence.

  3. The Washington Post dropped a bombshell this week. President Trump, we’re told, blew up at Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth at Camp David over munitions shortages that Hegseth supposedly hid from him. Two anonymous sources. That’s it. That’s the whole foundation.

    The White House says it’s PURE fake. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt called it “100% FAKE news” and said it “literally never EVER happened.” And the Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell went even a lot further, saying the Post was“ written by their Anonymous, No-name Sources” and that every part of the story is FALLSE, * FAKE. Trump himself posted that the reporting might even be “Treasonous.”

    So who’s lying? Maybe nobody. And Not even a little bit true.
    I’m not saying anonymous sourcing should never exist. But I am saying that this story is False!
    Here’s what bugs me about the Hegseth story specifically. But the specific claim that President Trump exploded at Hegseth in a private exchange, and that Hegseth threw his deputy under the bus, rests entirely on two people who won’t put their names on it and a flat denial from three separate government officials who remain to be nonymous sourcing that specificly is NOT TRUE, and it’s not even close to the truth. It Never Happened, Period!
    Fake news should carry consequences, and reporters who build stories on anonymous claims without any corroboration should own that risk publicly, not hide behind institutional credibility. Until both of those things happen, expect more stories like this one. Half the country will believe it. And the other Half won’t. And the actual truth, the thing that matters most when American troops are the ones who suffer the consequences .
    When leaking stops being about exposing wrongdoing and starts deliberately damaging national security, or protecting enemies, or revealing classified information that puts lives and operations at risk, the stakes change dramatically. And that’s very dangerous.

  4. Maybe the WNBA needs to start drafting goons like the old NHL/NBA
    Dave the Hammer Schults in drag.
    Bill Laimbeer with blonde dreg locks.

    Could work!

  5. Sophie besides being a general athletic nut is also a black belt in Ta-Kwon-Do,would suggest you do not fuck with her!

  6. They probably were not thinking of it as a choice to be political.

    Their initial position was probably to them the minimum necessary noises to make to signal ‘do not hurt me’.

    Hilary Clinton is pretty much the king feminist. Feminism is about Hilary’s political ambitions, and her ‘accomplishments’ symbolizing the success of all women. One of the more toxic women has coopted the cause of ‘all women’, and her enforcers are nasty women who exploit female psychology vulnerabilities. There’s basically a queen bee response, where women match to the signal of a scary (toxic) or impressive (positive or functional) woman and very carefully do not contradict the higher woman on the totem pole. It is actually significantly healthier where women are willing to dissent from a woman they see as statusy. (As far as I can tell. I am a non-woman hermit who is bad at this sort of observation.)

    In an environment where women have enough tools to destroy people, that sort of circumspection can show up in men. Men are less effective at it, but we can sometimes tell when folks are willing to destroy us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.