Navy disqualifies 151 sailors after sex assault review
Pretty negative, right? Obviously the Navy can’t get it’s act together so there are rapes left and right…
But if you actually READ the story…
The Navy initially had suspended five sailors among the 10,000 personnel it reviewed. That review was expanded to about 20,000 and resulted in the suspension of 151, Lt. Cmdr. Chris Servello, a Navy spokesman, said Wednesday.
The “vast majority” of the 151 didn’t receive the proper training or lacked certifications for duties involving sexual assault prevention and response.
Just a tad bit different isn’t it…
151 out of 20,000… Doing the math… that’s .0076 %…
They whole article is HERE at USAToday…
Nope no media bias, not a ‘smidgen’…
Sigh…
Something else is missing from the info. How many are opposite sex versus same sex assaults?
Opus, Obama put us beyond “don’t ask don’t tell” and the US Navy is now gender blind…sorta.
Opus- LL’s correct… and you can’t ‘ask’ those questions… Not PC and all that…
LL- Right. sigh…
In Obama’s Navy . . . .
Could the 151 have just read it wrong… “receive the proper training or lacked certifications for duties involving sexual assault”.
Maroons!
gfa
You don’t become an editor without learning to write provocative headlines. (Not that I disagree with you)
“Media Bias….Never…the paragon of virtues known as the mainstream media WOULD never spin a story to support an agenda.”….The Colombia school of broadcasting said so….<—-Sarcasm
Odie- Yep…
Dammit- Heh, possibly…
gfa- Oh yeah…
WSF- Agreed.
Bob- Yeah, right…
The fact “53% of sexual assaults are against Men usually by other Men” is rarely reported by the MSM.http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/24/us/in-debate-over-military-sexual-assault-men-are-overlooked-victims.html?pagewanted%3Dall&_r=1&
The Obama Media bias never. Snark
Navy- Yep…
Rick- Agreed…