Debunking Hillary…

Debunking Clinton’s Gun Control Agenda

Clinton wants to bring back her husband’s failed ban on assault weapons.

The Facts: The congressionally-mandated study of the federal “assault weapon” law found that: “At best, the assault weapons ban can have only a limited effect on total gun murders, because the banned weapons were never involved in more than a modest fraction of all gun murders.” (Urban Institute, “Impact Evaluation of the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act of 1994,” March 13, 1997, p. 3.)

Clinton wants so-called universal background checks. 

The Facts: Going back to the Virginia Tech shooting in 2007, every firearm used in a high-profile mass shooting went through a background check. Not a single one was bought from an “unregulated private sale,” through “the Internet,” or in “the parking lot at a gun show.” 

Clinton is open to Australia-style gun confiscation. 

The Facts: There is no conclusive evidence Australia’s 1996 gun control law made the people of Australia any safer. Don Weatherburn, director of the New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, told PolitiFact that the evidence is “far from conclusive.” Harvard’s David Hemenway, admitted, “We really don’t know.” While it is true that in the years after the law took effect, gun homicides and suicides declined. But they were declining before it took effect. Gun murders also subsided in this country after 1996. They fell in New Zealand, which declined to embrace the Australian approach.

Of course ‘we’ all know these are typical of the liberal left (who are protected by others with guns, so they never have to get their hands dirty)…

The NRA is also starting a new series of ads… HERE.

2016 is going to be a pivotal year in more than one way. It’s up to us peons to step up to the plate and make our voices heard.

h/t NRA Media


Debunking Hillary… — 18 Comments

  1. “The NRA is also starting a new series of ads… HERE.”

    “Number of playbacks has been exceeded.”
    I’ve never noticed a posted limit.
    I wonder if that happens with Dropbox?

  2. Every single item they’ve proposed is bullshit. None of it will stop a single thing. I know it, you know it, THEY know it. The only reason for all of this is to institute a fascist dictatorship, just like Hitler. They already control the media, the re-education camps are built, the Second Amendment is the only thing stopping the trains from rolling and the ovens being fired up.

  3. They don’t listen to or believe their own crap, so why should facts matter?
    They want our guns, period!


  4. It all revolves around (P)regressive’s favorite word, CONTROL.
    Firearms, energy, education, climate, personal vices, etc. need to be controlled because we unwashed masses need to have smart people telling us how to live.

  5. Hey Old NFO’;

    It is totally about control, the elitist want to tell the “hoi palloi” how to live. There is a certain group of people that likes getting off on control…just for the sake of control. The average liberal is a control freak, they gotta tell others how to live.

  6. NRA ad would hold a bit more cred if it showed Killary writing right handed. Somebody should have caught that…

  7. Proud life member of the NRA here. The question isn’t one of gun control, its a question of political control. Hillary should be in jail, not out pandering for power.

  8. Pingback: SayUncle » Hillary Clinton on gun control

  9. If the Hillabeest steals this election like Odumbo stole the last one, we’re screwed.
    Imagine what the Supremes would look like after a couple of her appointments…”Pajama Boy” X 6.