Maybe now we’ll finally get the details on JFK, MLK, and Robert Kennedy’s shootings…
President Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order to declassify files on the assassinations of former President John F. Kennedy, his brother Robert F. Kennedy and civil rights icon Martin Luther King Jr.
Trump had promised to release the previously classified documents during his 2024 campaign after decades of speculation and conspiracy theories about the killings.
“Everything will be revealed,” Trump told reporters as he signed the order in the Oval Office of the White House.
Full article, HERE from Fox News.
For years, and yes I go back that far, the assassination theorists have begged, sued, and attempted to ‘steal’ the documentation that .gov supposedly holds on all three of these.
I predict that there will be cries of ‘coverup’ on all three of them, and a lot of the files will be redacted to hell and gone.
There have been people making a ‘good’ living off their theories, books, and ‘investigations’, so maybe we’ll find out who was actually doing what, when, and where…
Do I expect definitive answers? Nope, not after the Warren Report. It was skewed to present ‘one’ view back in the day, and honestly, I don’t see the documents revealing much new, but I’m still going to look at them just out of curiosity.
“and a lot of the files will be redacted to hell and gone.”
Is this because the originals in the files are already redacted such that you can’t get at the unredacted information, or is it because those that will be releasing the information don’t want to fully obey the President’s executive order?
Maybe it’s both.
Yes.
I think the JFK “conspiracy theories” started about 10 minutes after the shots were fired. And yes the Warren Commission skewed the narrative because if Oswald didn’t act alone, the next most logical scenario was that Castro and possibly the USSR was behind the assassination, and nobody wanted to open that can of worms in an official investigation. After the Cuban missile crisis, with the Air Force advocating for a nuclear strike on Cuba, the feeling was that if the government officially acknowledged that Cuba may have been involved, there would have been a pubic outcry for retaliation against Castro. Worst case scenario, it might lead to World War III. Also even the Warren Commission didn’t have all the information it should have had, partly because some of it didn’t exist anywhere the government could access and partly because the CIA and FBI were covering their butts about some highly questionable activities.
RE Soviet backing the assassination: “Operation Solo: FBI’s Man in the Kremlin” is the story of how Morris Childs (a red diaper baby and member of the American Communist Party’s inner circle) became an informant for the FBI in the 50s continuing undetected until Childs finally retired in 82. The Soviets considered him the CPUSA’s Shadow Secretary of State and he met privately with ALL the top leaders every time he visited.
The book covers Childs being an informal ambassador between the USSR and Johnson, conveying that Oswald was ejected from Russia and the Presidium disavowed any involvement. They were terrified LBJ would retaliate and wanted to calm things down privately.
You are giving them more credit than they deserve, with ‘redactions’, as it assumes they would keep the original documents in the archive.
They have had 6 decades to put whatever documents in place to support the fictional narrative they want to present. So I don’t expect to see ‘redactions’ but also don’t expect to find out the truth.
The Warren Commission had one job–make it all go away. Worst cast scenario? It is revealed just how much LBJ knew in advance, and how much he was in on it.
LBJ will likely be found to have ordered all three. Oswald did act alone. He wanted to go back to the USSR and be a hero. Oswald did not know about the CIA shooter and the CIA shooter did not know about Oswald. But they jumped on blaming Oswald for the crime weather or not his bullet did the deed.
None of these “reports” can be trusted after a half + century of time. The FBI/CIA have without doubt corrupted the reports to the point where they are worthless.
That’s good, but I want the Epstein clint list and the Las Vegas shooting docs as well.
All- thanks, you do raise some interesting points.
My guess. Won’t change anything.
Say thank you you championing sharing this!
https://youaboutlove.com
It’s always inviting to see different perspectives on this topic.
I rate the stab and itemize spell out into this register – it provides valuable insights and definitely gives me something to think about.
Looking insolent to more theme like this!
Perceive also – https://hardcorehdtube.com
The Warren Commission only met a few times, and the actual “investigation” was mostly done by interns and Congressional staffers. The quality of their work was, um, not up to accepted law enforcement standards.
I’ve read the abridged Warren Commission Report – the whole thing is 26 volumes – and Gerald Ford’s account of his time on the Commission, and Jim Garrison’s account of his investigation as New Orleans’ District Attorney. Garrison’s claims to jurisdiction were shaky in my opinion, but at least he seemed to know how to run an investigation.
The whole assassination thing starts off with “WTF!” and makes a beeline to absurdity. There are holes in the official story you could drive a truck through.
Just at the beginning, according to the Warren Commission report, one (1) Dallas cop ran into the Book Depository. Oswald had just come down the stairs and was getting a drink out of the Coke machine, and asked the cop what was going on. The cop said the President had been shot, and went running up the stairs. No attempt was made to secure the building, so Oswald simply went out the door and walked away, right in front of the police and SS.
And if that sounds unlikely, buckle up, because it’s WTF all the way through. And frankly, the parts about the Commission trying to interview Oswald’s wife, and his mother’s attempt to talk with the Commission, are hilarious.
If you really want to know the story on JFK’s killing, read the book “Mortal Error”. The investigator/writer was the only shooter that passed the ABC recreation of the Oswald 3-shot scenario that had a moving target. He decided that he would look into the assassination, and then spent about 25 years pursuing the story as a “hobby”. Became a court rated expert for guns and shootings.
Right off to start, he found that there were NO ballistic experts with the Warren Commission. Odd, no? Eventually he figured out why that was important.
He discovered that although there were three fired cases found with the Carcano rifle, only two were actually fired by Oswald at JFK. The third was used as a snap cap by Oswald while waiting.
He also found that only about 25% of all the evidence collected by the Commission was ever looked at by them.
He took Kennedy’s xrays to a thoracic surgeon to get an opinion on how bad that neck damage was. He was told that the patient (not ID’d) would be a quadriplegic, with about a 6 month expected survival. (early 60’s medical view)
I should point out that it didn’t take him decades to figure it out, but, due to some artful misdirection by the SS, he didn’t determine who fired the kill shot until much later. The data points that all the other investigators/movie makers, etc, had trouble explaining, simply ignored, or were wrong about, he figured out. He made it all fit together and make sense.
If not for Kennedy family and political reasons, this book is what the Warren Commission should have ended up with.
People will believe what they want, regardless of the evidence.