Well, got home today and low and behold I had a package…
I WILL wear it with pride and thanks lady! That’s great!!! 🙂
Just don’t ask me to pronounce the Latin…
I WILL wear it with pride and thanks lady! That’s great!!! 🙂
Just don’t ask me to pronounce the Latin…
Not just ‘civilians’…
Per the media 2 dead, 9 wounded in NYC in the Empire shooting this morning; article HERE. Now a couple of points for consideration…
Colt .45 used by Perp, so max 8/9 rounds (without extended mag), puts 2 in his ex-boss, when killed one round still in mag; one spare mag (full) found in briefcase (according to police report). So by “MY” math that means he fired either six or seven shots…
So two into the boss, that leaves either four or five rounds to shoot others… Unless he was firing magic bullets, that does NOT add up to 11 dead/wounded…
It calls into question how many rounds were fired by police, and what they hit…
I’m thinking there were at least ‘some’ Rule 4 violations by police in this incident…
Now what coach??? Oh yeah, and that whole gun free zone worked again…
Wall Street and the media normally congratulate the CEO for making this type of “tough decision”, and the board of directors gives upper corporate management big bonuses..
Our government should NOT be immune from similar risks.
Therefore:
Reduce the House of Representatives from the current435 members to 218 members.
Accomplish this over the next 8 years (two steps/two elections) and of course this would require some redistricting.
Some Yearly Monetary Gains Include:
$44,108,400 for elimination of base pay for congress. (267 members X $165,200 pay/member/ yr.)
$437,100,000 for elimination of their staff. (Estimate $1.3 Million in staff per each member of the House, and $3 Million in staff per each member of the Senate every year)
$108,350,000 for the reduction in remaining staff by 25%.
$7,500,000,000reduction in pork barrel earmarks each year. (Those members whose jobs are gone. Current estimates for total government pork earmarks are at$15 Billion/yr).
The remaining representatives would need to work smarter and improve efficiencies.. It might even be in their best interests to work together for the good of our country!
We may also expect that smaller committees might lead to a more efficient resolution of issues as well. It might even be easier to keep track of what your representative is doing.
Congress has more tools available to do their jobs than it had back in 1911 when the current number of representatives was established. (Telephone, computers, cell phones to name a few)
Note:
Congress does not hesitate to head home for extended weekends, holidays and recesses, when what the nation needs is a real fix for economic problems. Also, we had 3 senators who were not doing their jobs for the 18+ months (on the campaign trail) and still they all accepted full pay. Minnesota survived very well with only one senator for the first half of a year. These facts alone support a reduction in senators and congress.
Summary:
$44,108,400 reduction of congress members.
$282,100,000 elimination of the reduced house member staff.
$150,000,000 elimination of reduced senate member staff.
$70,850,000 for 25% reduction of staff for remaining house members.
$37,500,000 for 25% reduction of staff for remaining senate members.
$7,500,000,000 reduction in pork added to bills by the reduction of congress members.
$8,084,558,400 per year, estimated total savings. (That’s 8-BILLION just to start!)
Corporate America does these types of cuts all the time.There’s even a name for it — “Downsizing.”
——————————
Also, if Congresspersons were required to serve 20, 25 or 30 years (like everyone else) in order to collect retirement benefits, taxpayers could save a bundle.
Now they get full retirement after serving only ONE term.
Army officials called the posting “unprecedented” for Army service component commands — of which Fort Shafter is one — and said it’s rare to have a foreign officer that high in command in the U.S. Army.
Australian Maj. Gen. Richard “Rick” Maxwell Burr will start in early November. Among his duties, Burr will serve as the main command post deputy commanding general for contingency operations, direct the development of annual training and exercise plans, and provide oversight of engagement within the South Asia and Oceania areas, the Army said.
Burr will report to and advise and assist Lt. Gen. Francis Wiercinski, commander of U.S. Army Pacific.
Army Secretary John McHugh, stopping in Hawaii after visiting Turkey, Mongolia and South Korea, told reporters Monday that Army leaders in Hawaii are “trying to ensure what has been the case in all these years — that is that the Army remains a vital force in the Pacific.” Bringing in Burr is part of the effort to maintain that importance, McHugh said.
McHugh said the Australians “have been one of, if not our most, critical partners” in places such as Afghanistan.
“I don’t think it’s surprising, then, as we look to engage in this part of the region, where we’re looking for bilateral or trilateral and beyond relationships, that we’d bring in someone like Maj. Gen. Burr,” McHugh said.
Burr commanded Australian Special Forces Task Groups in Afghanistan in 2002 and for the invasion of Iraq in 2003, and in 2008 was commander of all Special Forces assigned to the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan.
There are combined force command elements in South Korea with U.S. Army and Korean officers, foreign liaison officers within U.S. commands, and a one-star Canadian general with the Army’s III Corps in Texas, but Hawaii Army officials could not come up with any other foreign two-star officers in the Army.Maj. Gen. Roger F. Mathews also is a deputy commanding general at U.S. Army Pacific, which oversees Army forces in an area that covers half the globe.
Army officials were asked Monday how allies such as Japan and South Korea have viewed the Australian posting.
“Those are great allies and partners of the United States, and so there’s been curiosity and some questions in that regard,” said Mathews, the other deputy commander at U.S. Army Pacific.
ASKED whether there might be other, similar foreign officer appointments to the Army, McHugh said, “We’re going to continue to do what we need to do to work on a regional basis.”
He added, “When we talk about the United States’ interest in the Pacific region, our concern is peace and stability (and) economic opportunity, and we don’t view that as an America-only objective. We think it’s critical that we work with all the nations of this region to pursue what I hope are goals that everyone shares.”
McHugh said the Army conducted 160 engagements in the Pacific region last year.
But the Army’s future funding in the region is somewhat unclear with the Pentagon pursuing an Air-Sea Battle concept relying heavily on the Navy and Air Force to deal with high-tech anti-access weaponry — particularly that of China in the South China Sea.
“The critical problem right now is making sure that those who make the national military strategic decisions understand the availability of these Army forces,” McHugh said.
The Army now has an office where Air-Sea Battle is being formulated within the Pentagon, he said.
“As you look at this region — and I think people like (Adm. Samuel Locklear III, head of U.S. Pacific Command) would fully agree — you really can’t approach a meaningful, successful strategy in the Pacific without Army forces,” he said.
Twenty-two of 27 chiefs of defense in the region are part of their countries’ armies, officials have said.
“So the history shows the Army has long been a critical player here in the Pacific,” McHugh said. “I think the future will show that every bit as well.”
I think it will be interesting to see how this plays out… in MANY ways… Your thoughts???
She turned to me and asked, ‘Are you having it catered’?
And that, my friend, is the definition of ‘OLD’!
‘98,’ she replied: ‘Two years older than me’
‘So you’re 96,’ the undertaker commented.
She responded, ‘Hardly worth going home, is it?’
‘And what do you think is the best thing about being 104?’ the reporter asked.
She simply replied, ‘No peer pressure.’
I’ve had two bypass surgeries, a hip replacement, new knees, fought prostate cancer and diabetes I’m half blind, can’t hear anything quieter than a jet engine, take 40 different medications that
make me dizzy, winded, and subject to blackouts. Have bouts with dementia. Have poor circulation; hardly feel my hands and feet anymore. Can’t remember if I’m 85 or 92. Have lost all my friends. But, thank God, I still have my driver’s license!
‘Then I’ll be sure my daughters visit me twice a week’
Rather than the economy and the current BS going on, the election is decided by Iran, Israel, Egypt, China, and Mexico???
What am I talking about?
Well, we got into this over lunch today. The consensus is that China, Iran and Mexico are all waiting until AFTER the elections to make their respective moves… Egypt is moving NOW…
Iran wants to take out Israel (and they want a nuke capability NOW), Egypt is moving weapons, etc. to the border (in contravention of the peace treaty), China has ‘taken’ part of the Spratleys and vowed to push ‘foreigners’ beyond the second island chain; e.g. beyond Guam) and China and Japan are currently at a ‘near war’ footing over occupations of various islands. And Mexico’s ‘new’ (this time around) administration is basically saying it’s going to go back to the old way of dealing with the cartels (e.g. take payoffs and let er rip)…
Romney has already made his position clear, supports Israel, America’s closest ally, and understands they consider their backs to be against the wall. AND he’s indicated he will stand up to the Chinese also. Mexico? Who knows…
Obama doesn’t want to intervene (by releasing the bunker busters), fearing to alienate his muslim allies in the region and the new Egyptian power structure. He agrees with some of the retired Generals that “we” can deal with an Iranian bomb. And he’s already letting China do what they want in SEA. We also know what he’s ‘tried’ through Holder with Fast and Furious.
This article HERE, by Arnaud De Borchgrave (UPI) has more in-depth discussion of the ‘Israel’ situation… And Peter has a great post up HERE. Of note, Israel IS pushing Obama to take a stand and visit Israel, but that just ain’t happening…
Now when you move West, in addition to the Spratleys occupation (with military AND civilians who now say they are the government), and the whole Senkaku situation blowing up yet again, HERE and HERE.
And what are we doing? Nothing, the Fleet has been told to back off…
And Mexico? LL has a great post up HERE detailing what is going on and our response? Nothing, unless you count the Dream Act and free welfare for illegals…
What happens if ANY of these situations blows up prior to the election? Then THAT will become the lead item, and IF the USA (e.g. the current administration) don’t step up and stand up, we think Obama will lose in a landslide.
If Obama gets re-elected, then we think that will be open season for Iran, Egypt, China and Mexico to pretty much do what they want…
Bottom line, this IS the most important election in my lifetime, and probably yours too! Don’t trust the media to give you the straight story, take the time to research the issues and KNOW what the candidates stand for.
Your vote DOES count, and you need to exercise your RIGHTS and vote!!!
Phyllis Diller has gone to be reunited with Bob Hope, Milton Berle and all the other old time comedians…
Good article HERE!
She was funny as hell, always on purpose, and she made quite a few trips with Bob Hope to Vietnam and other places supporting our troops.
RIP Phyllis, and thanks for the ride! You were literally one of a kind!