Truth!!!

Snigs hits a home run with THIS post!!!  Plain talk, but dead on the money!  


I’m sick of it.  Nobody is SPECIAL.  Not heterosexuals, homosexuals, blacks, whites, Christians, non-Christians, Republicans, Democrats, Independents, men nor women.  NOBODY has the market cornered on being right.  You are no more right in your way of thinking than I am in my way of thinking.”

‘Suthern’ Humor…


A Florida senior citizen drove his brand new Corvette convertible out of the dealership. Taking off down the road, he pushed it to 80 mph, enjoying the wind blowing through what little hair he had left.  “Amazing,” he thought as he flew down I-95, pushing the pedal even more.


Looking in his rear view mirror, he saw a Florida State Trooper, blue lights flashing and siren blaring. He floored it to 100 mph, then 110, then 120. Suddenly he thought, “What am I doing? I’m too old for this!” and pulled over to await the trooper’s arrival.


Pulling in behind him, the trooper got out of his vehicle and walked up to the Corvette. He looked at his watch, then said, “Sir, my shift ends in 30 minutes. Today is Friday. If you can give me a new reason for speeding–a reason I’ve never before heard — I’ll let you go.”


The old gentleman paused then said: “Three years ago, my wife ran off with a Florida State Trooper. I thought you were bringing her back. 
“Have a good day, Sir,” replied the trooper.


Georgia 


The owner of a golf course in Georgia was confused about paying an invoice, so he decided to ask his secretary for some mathematical help.
He called her into his office and said, “Y’all graduated from the University of Georgia and I need some help.  If I wuz to give yew $20,000, minus 14%, how much would you take off?”
The secretary thought a moment, and then replied, “Everthang but my earrings.”


Louisiana


A senior citizen in Louisiana was overheard saying… “When the end of the world comes, I hope to be in Louisiana.”
When asked why, he replied, “I’d rather be in Louisiana ’cause everythang happens in Louisiana 20 years later than in the rest of the world.”


Mississippi


The young man from Mississippi came running into the store and said to his buddy, “Bubba, somebody just stole your pickup truck from the parking lot!”
Bubba replied, “Did y’all see who it was?”
The young man answered, “I couldn’t tell, but I got the license number.”


North Carolina


A man in North Carolina had a flat tire, pulled off on the side of the road, and proceeded to put a bouquet of flowers in front of the car and one behind it. Then he got back in the car to wait.
A passerby studied the scene as he drove by, and was so curious he turned around and went back.  He asked the fellow what the problem was.
The man replied, “I got a flat tahr.”
The passerby asked, “But what’s with the flowers?”
The man responded, “When you break down they tell you to put flares in the front and flares in the back. I never did understand it neither.”


Tennessee


A Tennessee State trooper pulled over a pickup on I-65.  The trooper asked, “Got any ID?”
The driver replied, “Bout whut?”


Texas


The Sheriff pulled up next to the guy unloading garbage out of his pick-up into the ditch. The Sheriff asked, “Why are you dumping garbage in the ditch?  Don’t you see that sign right over your head.”
“Yep,” he replied. “That’s why I’m dumpin’ it here, ’cause it says: ‘Fine For Dumping Garbage.’ “


And one to think about…



Old Guy And A Bucket Of Shrimp
This is a true story, 
Hope you appreciate it and want to pass it along. 
It happened every Friday evening, almost without fail, when the sun resembled a giant orange and was starting to dip into the blue ocean.


Old Ed came strolling along the beach to his favorite pier.. Clutched in his bony hand was a bucket of shrimp. Ed walks out to the end of the pier, where it seems he almost has the world to himself. The glow of the sun is a golden bronze now. 


Everybody’s gone, except for a few joggers on the beach. Standing out on the end of the pier, Ed is alone with his thoughts…and his bucket of shrimp. 


Before long, however, he is no longer alone. Up in the sky a thousand white dots come screeching and squawking, winging their way toward that lanky frame standing there on the end of the pier. 


Before long, dozens of seagulls have enveloped him, their wings fluttering and flapping wildly. Ed stands there tossing shrimp to the hungry birds. As he does, if you listen closely, you can hear him say with a smile, ‘Thank you. Thank you.’


In a few short minutes the bucket is empty. But Ed doesn’t leave. 


He stands there lost in thought, as though transported to another time and place. 


When he finally turns around and begins to walk back toward the beach, a few of the birds hop along the pier with him until he gets to the stairs, and then they, too, fly away. And old Ed quietly makes his way down to the end of the beach and on home. 


If you were sitting there on the pier with your fishing line in the water, Ed might seem like ‘a funny old duck,’ as my dad used to say. Or, ‘a guy who’s a sandwich shy of a picnic,’ as my kids might say. To onlookers, he’s just another old codger, lost in his own weird world, feeding the seagulls with a bucket full of shrimp. 


To the onlooker, rituals can look either very strange or very empty. They can seem altogether unimportant …. maybe even a lot of nonsense. 


Old folks often do strange things, at least in the eyes of Boomers and Busters. 


Most of them would probably write Old Ed off, down there in Florida . That’s too bad. They’d do well to know him better. 


His full name: Eddie Rickenbacker. He was a famous hero back in World War II. On one of his flying missions across the Pacific, he and his seven-member crew went down. Miraculously, all of the men survived, crawled out of their plane, and climbed into a life raft. 


Captain Rickenbacker and his crew floated for days on the rough waters of the Pacific. They fought the sun. They fought sharks. Most of all, they fought hunger. By the eighth day their rations ran out. No food. No water. They were hundreds of miles from land and no one knew where they were. 


They needed a miracle. That afternoon they had a simple devotional service and prayed for a miracle. They tried to nap. Eddie leaned back and pulled his military cap over his nose. Time dragged. All he could hear was the slap of the waves against the raft.. 


Suddenly, Eddie felt something land on the top of his cap.
It was a seagull! 


Old Ed would later describe how he sat perfectly still, planning his next move. With a flash of his hand and a squawk from the gull, he managed to grab it and wring its neck.. He tore the feathers off, and he and his starving crew made a meal – a very slight meal for eight men – of it. Then they used the intestines for bait.. With it, they caught fish, which gave them food and more bait…….and the cycle continued. With that simple survival technique, they were able to endure the rigors of the sea until they were found and rescued (after 24 days at sea…). 


Eddie Rickenbacker lived many years beyond that ordeal, but he never forgot the sacrifice of that first life-saving seagull… And he never stopped saying, ‘Thank you.’ That’s why almost every Friday night when they were in Florida,  he would walk to the end of the pier with a bucket full of shrimp and a heart full of gratitude. 


As you see I wanted to pass it on. It was a great story that I’ve heard before, and is a classic story of giving back. Eddie Rickenbacker was also one hellva leader! Among other things, he was a squadron commander in WWI, earned the Medal of Honor,     owned the Indianapolis Raceway (and the 500), Eastern Air Lines, and was a consultant and speaker many years ago.


You got to be careful with us old guys; you never know what we have done! 🙂


God Bless our Troops and God Bless America.

Chick-Fil-A…

Couldn’t make it yesterday (no parking, drive throughs were too long), but went today at lunch at the Mall, wait was about 20 minutes, estimate 60-70 folks in line!  They were the busiest food place in the food court!

Posted from my iPhone.

More on Sequestration…

Can somebody ‘splain this to me???



If Defense is only 20% of the budget, WHY is Defense taking 42-48% (depending on which set of numbers you want to believe) of the Sequestration cuts???

At our little golf tournament yesterday, this was a subject of conversation, and the fact that most of the defense contractors are already laying people off/giving early retirements, and ARE going to send out warnings of possible massive firings in either Oct or Nov, as required by the The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN).

Which is contrary to the BS now being put out by the Department of Labor-

Major defense contractors are wary of the impending cuts and debating whether they need to advise employees 60 days in advance of possible layoffs. That would be four days before the election. A law says those notices would have to go out ahead of time.

The Labor Department, however, said Monday that federal contractors do not have to warn their employees about potential layoffs from the automatic, across-the-board budget cuts due to kick in Jan. 2. The guidance letter said it would be “inappropriate” for employers to send such warnings because it is still speculative if and where the cuts might occur.

Because if they do this, it’s gonna get REAL interesting on 6 Nov! A lot of those layoffs WILL be union folks, and how are they going to like that???

The White House told agency officials Tuesday to “continue normal spending and operations” since more than five months remain for Congress to act to avert the automatic cuts.

Full article in the WAPO HERE

And a counter point from the Washington Times HERE

And from the WARN Act, the actual words of the requirement…

General Provisions

WARN offers protection to workers, their families and communities by requiring employers to provide notice 60 days in advance of covered plant closings and covered mass layoffs. This notice must be provided to either affected workers or their representatives (e.g., a labor union); to the State dislocated worker unit; and to the appropriate unit of local government.

Employer Coverage

In general, employers are covered by WARN if they have 100 or more employees, not counting employees who have worked less than 6 months in the last 12 months and not counting employees who work an average of less than 20 hours a week. Private, for-profit employers and private, nonprofit employers are covered, as are public and quasi-public entities which operate in a commercial context and are separately organized from the regular government. Regular Federal, State, and local government entities which provide public services are not covered.

Employee Coverage

Employees entitled to notice under WARN include hourly and salaried workers, as well as managerial and supervisory employees. Business partners are not entitled to notice.

What Triggers Notice

Plant Closing: A covered employer must give notice if an employment site (or one or more facilities or operating units within an employment site) will be shut down, and the shutdown will result in an employment loss (as defined later) for 50 or more employees during any 30-day period. This does not count employees who have worked less than 6 months in the last 12 months or employees who work an average of less than 20 hours a week for that employer. These latter groups, however, are entitled to notice (discussed later).

Mass Layoff: A covered employer must give notice if there is to be a mass layoff which does not result from a plant closing, but which will result in an employment loss at the employment site during any 30-day period for 500 or more employees, or for 50-499 employees if they make up at least 33% of the employer’s active workforce. Again, this does not count employees who have worked less than 6 months in the last 12 months or employees who work an average of less than 20 hours a week for that employer. These latter groups, however, are entitled to notice (discussed later).

An employer also must give notice if the number of employment losses which occur during a 30-day period fails to meet the threshold requirements of a plant closing or mass layoff, but the number of employment losses for 2 or more groups of workers, each of which is less than the minimum number needed to trigger notice, reaches the threshold level, during any 90-day period, of either a plant closing or mass layoff. Job losses within any 90-day period will count together toward WARN threshold levels, unless the employer demonstrates that the employment losses during the 90-day period are the result of separate and distinct actions and causes.

Funny, I don’t see ANY wording in there about this being ‘optional’…

At this point, about the only thing I can think of is to defeat ALL the incumbents and start over… And that is exactly what we’ll have to do; and hope that we actually have time to fix things before we become a third world country militarily! 

Which reminds me, I need more duct tape… I’m down to the last roll, and using a roll a week to keep my head from exploding from all the BS coming out of DC…

Hard Day at the ‘Office’…

Today was ‘one’ of those days…  Had to go play ‘nice’, so we ended up playing in a golf tourney today.  It was hot, I was in the woods, the sand, the water, and damn near every where else…LOL  Playing best ball tourneys give a whole new meaning to hit everything you’ve got! 🙂

We came in with a 61 on a par 72 (11 under), and I think we finished 10th out of 18 foursomes!!! The winner was a score of 54 (18 under), and 2nd and 3rd place tied at 55 (17 under).

It’s not fair when the bring in the young, limber ringers!  Two on the winning team had played college golf, and were both scratch golfers; and they just killed the rest of us…LOL

We made nice though, got to see some old friends, got some decent food, and more free golf balls than I don’t use! The nicest thing was a bottle opener! 🙂 

This was designed by one of the engineering interns out of scrap from production…

And I know I’m gonna hear all the jokes about little balls,  but what the heck, a day on the golf course ‘working’ sure beats the hell out of a day in the office… 🙂

It’s Academic…

Lately there have been a number of articles, commentaries, and speeches about women going into combat.  On the left (the major pushers for this), they continue to use the military as an ongoing social experiment. 


I’m old enough to remember the whole Women In the Navy (WIN) thing, and the BS surrounding that (all run by PHDs). They even refused to have female admin types, making the Navy order in all male admin types to ‘assist’…


And I’ve seen the bodies this crap has caused…  


One of my co-workers came in crowing about this again this morning, and how ‘happy’ she was about the equality!  However, when I pointed out THIS article, and this set of data (below), she was NOT happy!



About a dozen nations — including Israel, Norway, Canada and Germany — allow women in combat roles.


Of note- ONLY Israeli women have actually seen significant combat, and that was on their own soil…


Sporadic studies about the effects of training and war on women have been conducted.


In the 1990s, the British army, under political pressure to put women in traditional male jobs, adopted a “gender-free” policy with identical fitness requirements for both sexes and abandoned its “gender fair” system of separate standards.


A decade later, Dr. Ian Gemmel conducted a study for the British army’s personnel center. He found that the number of women who could qualify for basic training decreased in the “gender-free” system, as more women dropped out of training because of injury, compared with the “gender fair” system of separate fitness requirements.


“This study confirms and quantifies the excess risk for women when they undertake the same arduous training as male recruits,” Dr. Gemmel reported.


In a second study, the British Defense Ministry conducted an extensive two-year assessment of women and their ability to perform routine ground combat tasks, such as lifting and carrying gear over certain distances.


Its May 2002 findings, in a report titled “Women in the Armed Forces,” were not encouraging for advocates of women in combat.


The study concluded that only 0.1 percent of female applicants and 1 percent of trained female soldiers “would reach the required standards to meet the demands of these roles.”

“The military viewpoint was that under the conditions of a high intensity close-quarter battle, group cohesion becomes of much greater significance to team performance and, in such an environment, the consequences of failure can have far-reaching and grave consequences,” the report stated. “To admit women would, therefore, involve a risk with no gains in terms of combat effectiveness to offset it.”


In 2010, the British government reviewed its policies and opted to retain the ban on women in combat.


That year, a group of U.S. Army physicians studied one brigade combat team deployed to Iraq in 2007.


Their study, published in the journal Military Medicine, examined the number of soldiers who sustained a disease or noncombat injury. Of 4,122 soldiers (325 women in support roles), 1,324 had a disease or injury that forced them to miss time or be evacuated.


“Females, compared with males, had a significantly increased incident-rate ratio for becoming a [disease or noncombat] casualty,” the doctors found.


Of 47 female soldiers evacuated from the brigade, 35 — or 74 percent — were for “pregnancy-related issues.” Women had more than triple the evacuation rate of men.


“I infer from this that women are twice as likely to suffer non-battle injuries in current specialties,” William Gregor, a professor of social sciences at the Army’s Command and Staff College, told The Times. “They will probably have a greater injury rate in heavy physical occupational specialties and the combat arms. The British experience with gender-free or neutral training standards suggests the injury rate will dramatically increase.”

UPDATE- Thanks to Tim for THIS article by a serving USMC female Captain!

Of course her ‘excuse’ was, “Well, the General says without being able to go into combat women can’t succeed.”  To which I said sounds like the General did pretty well for herself…


Then I got the diatribe about how it wasn’t FAIR, and women ‘deserved’ the chance to go into combat.  When I asked her if she’d go, I got the too old, family, etc (and she’s WAY overweight), so I turned it on her; and said what about your daughter, why don’t you tell HER to volunteer today (her daughter is 18), AND volunteer for combat?  She should be able to pass the physical requirements, her being a cheerleader and Lacrosse player on scholarship, she should be willing to forgo that scholarship to serve the country!


She stuttered, spit, turned white and refused to answer my question…


THAT is when I realized as far as the female left is concerned, it’s all academic, BECAUSE THEY KNOW “THEY” WON’T HAVE TO GO!!!


They don’t give a shit about the women that actually DO go in the military, and ‘know’ they and their precious little ones will be safe…


Sigh…


As far as I’m concerned, if they want this crap, then re-institute the draft, put ALL kids between 18-22 in the military and train em ALL for combat.  No excuses, no waivers, no outs; if that happened a lot of this social experimentation would stop!!! 


Of course I know I’ll be called a male chauvinist pig, but I’m tired of  them playing games with the lives of our troops (Male AND Female), just so they can make us more PC… 

A little help…

Snigs has this up on her blog-

If you have a spare dollar or two, please consider making a donation to CJ’s Warriors.
CJ is a child with leukemia…a really sweet kid who has been one helluva trooper throughout his treatments.
I went to school with his Dad and they’re good folks.
I’ve signed up to walk, as have my kids. So my family is trying to raise at least $300 in contributions. If you get to the site & don’t know my name or my kids’ names, shoot me a message & I’ll hook you up.
I don’t ask for much, but this could mean a real difference in a child’s life.
Thanks. :)

If you can spare a buck or two, I’m sure she’d appreciate the donation and knowing it’s going to a good cause is even better!

2+2+2+…

Sigh… It just keeps coming and coming…

Ammo Ban Bill-

The proposal, crafted by Democratic Senator Frank Lautenberg and Democratic Representative Carolyn McCarthy, aims to restrict the ability of Americans to buy unlimited quantities of ammunition over the Internet, or by mail order, anonymously.

The new legislation, dubbed the Stop Online Ammunition Sales Act, rests on four pillars, according to Lautenberg’s office:

It requires anyone selling ammunition to be a licensed dealer.

It requires ammunition buyers who are not licensed dealers to present photo identification at the time of purchase, effectively banning the online or mail order purchase of ammo by regular civilians.

It requires licensed ammunition dealers to maintain records of the sale of ammunition.

It requires licensed ammunition dealers to report the sale of more than 1,000 rounds of ammunition to an unlicensed person within any five consecutive business days.

Full article HERE

And another one…

As the brief explains, “the objective of this effort is to procure riot gear to prepare for the 2012 Democratic and Republican National Conventions, the 2013 Presidential Inauguration and other future similar activities.”

Specifically, DHS is looking to obtain:
“147 riot helmets” with “adjustable tactical face shield with liquid seal”
“147 sets of upper body and shoulder protection”
“152 sets of thigh and groin protection”
“147 hard-shell shin guards” with “substantial protection from flying debris, non-ballistic weapons, and blows to the leg” and “optimized protective design for severe riot control or tactical situations.”
“156 forearm protectors”
“147 pairs of tactical gloves”

The urgency of the order can be explained by the fact that there is a growing anticipation that many demonstrators will travel to the Republican National Convention (RNC), scheduled for August 27-30 in Tampa Bay, Florida, and Democratic National Convention (DNC), planned for September 3-6 in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Another recent DHS move to gear up was back in March of this year, when it gave the defense contractor ATK a deal to provide the DHS with 450 million .40 caliber hollow-point ammunition over a five year period.

On top of that, the DHS has recently purchased a number of bullet-proof checkpoint booths and hired hundreds of new security guards to protect government buildings.

Full article HERE, actual solicitation HERE; and the Marines are standing up 500 man ‘police’ MP Battalions at Pendleton…

On a much more positive note-
The Confederate Air Force B-17 and B-25 over Saguaro Lake Arizona. Stunning pieces of history, and beautifully filmed in HD.




And if you have 15 minutes to kill, Apache’s working over Taliban in Afghanistan… NOT PC!

They just refuse to give up…

There are truly times I’m ‘glad’ when I can skip a news day…  Otherwise I’d need another case or two of duct tape…

The usual suspects are up to the usual shenanigans inside the beltway, and I get back to THIS

Democratic senators offer gun control amendment for cybersecurity bill
By Ramsey Cox – 07/26/12 07:29 PM ET

Democratic senators have offered an amendment to the cybersecurity bill that would limit the purchase of high capacity gun magazines for some consumers.
Shortly after the Cybersecurity Act gained Senate approval to proceed to filing proposed amendments and a vote next week, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), a sponsor of the gun control amendment, came to the floor to defend the idea of implementing some “reasonable” gun control measures.

The amendment was sponsored by Democratic Sens. Frank Lautenberg (N.J.), Barbara Boxer (Calif.), Jack Reed (R.I.), Bob Menendez (N.J.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Schumer and Dianne Feinstein (Calif.). S.A. 2575 would make it illegal to transfer or possess large capacity feeding devices such as gun magazines, belts, feed stripes and drums of more than 10 rounds of ammunition with the exception of .22 caliber rim fire ammunition. 

The amendment is identical to a separate bill sponsored by Lautenberg. Feinstein was the sponsor of the assault weapons ban, which expired in 2004. 


The proposed amendment would only affect sales and transfers after the law took effect.


Uh huh, SURE it will…  


Schumer defended the Brady law and assault weapons ban on the floor Thursday evening, perhaps in preparation for the coming fight with Republicans and gun rights activists.

Schumer suggested that both the left and right find common ground.
“Maybe we could come together on guns if each side gave some,” Schumer said. 




Chuck You’s idea of common ground is for US to give up everything and they get their way…


He suggested that Democrats make it clear that their goal is not to repeal the Second Amendment.



YEAH, RIGHT…


“The basic complaint is that the Chuck Schumers of the world want to take away your guns,” Schumer said of the argument made by gun lobbies. “I think it would be smart for those of us who want rational gun control to make it know that that’s not true at all.”

Schumer also pointed out that it would be reasonable for the right to recognize that background checks on those buying guns is necessary — as called for in the Brady law. He also said average Americans don’t need an assault weapon to go hunting or protect themselves.


Um… We ALREADY have that… And criminals DON’T do background checks…


“We can debate where to draw the line of reasonableness, but we might be able to come to an agreement in the middle,” Schumer said. “Maybe, maybe, maybe we can pass some laws that might, might, might stop some of the unnecessary casualties … maybe there’s a way we can some together and try to break through the log jam and make sure the country is a better place.”


It would be a MUCH better place if we had CCW everywhere!!! Then ALL the criminals would have to think twice…


Next week the Senate is expected to debate and vote on proposed amendments to the cybersecurity bill.


Make sure you let YOUR Senators know what you believe, and what you expect of them!!!

YGTBSM (Again)…

Kinda says it all…



I don’t EVEN want to say what I’m thinking right now…


Sigh…