Now if they tried that here, they would need MUCH larger machines… Just sayin…
h/t JP
OPSEC is NOT a game, nor should it be a pawn in a re-election campaign…
You can read the entire article HERE on it, with of course, the push back from the administration.
Watch this for what it says, and listen to these folks who’ve been there/done that. They are talking about their friends, family, and bigger family of the Special Operations/Intel world. There is a reason there are ONLY stars and not names on the wall at CIA headquarters… They understand that leaks compromise not only people but ongoing intelligence operations that may be critical to keeping our folks alive.
2012 White House Revision, ah la the Chicago way:
The porcupines, realizing the situation, decided to group together to keep warm. This way they covered and protected themselves; but the quills of each one wounded their closest companions.
After awhile, they decided to distance themselves one from the other and they began to die, alone and frozen. So they had to make a choice: either accept the quills of their companions or disappear from the Earth.
Wisely, they decided to go back to being together. They learned to live with the little wounds caused by the close Relationship with their companions in order to receive the heat that came from the others. This way they were able to survive.
The best relationship is not the one that brings together perfect people, but when each individual learns to live with the imperfections of others and can admire the other person’s good qualities.
The moral of the story is:
Just learn to live with the Pricks in your life!And apparently within 20 minutes of the announcement of Ryan, the dems put out the first attack ad on Ryan about Social Security…
WHY has it come to this? Chicago gang politics should NOT be accepted by the American people in a presidential race. I for one am totally disgusted by the whole partisanship bullshit games strategy. And I’m also disgusted by the media bias that is out there, even though there is ‘supposedly’ no bias! Yeah, right!!!
What happened to the ‘civility’ Obama promised??? I guess in the ‘race’ to re-election all bets are off for them…
There are a number of articles available on how Obama ‘won’ all his elections, and it all boils down to dirty politics and throwing enough shit (legally and illegally gathered) at the opponent until they either resign, stop running, or are unable to fight off the BS…
Why are we not discussing the economy? Sequestration? Entitlement reform? The border? The politicization of the military for social experiments? 48% of those on the tax rolls NOT paying any taxes? THOSE are the real issues for America.
Peter has a great post up HERE on that!
I think part of the issue is that the dems for MANY years have ‘bought’ votes with entitlements, promises and blatant racism at the polls. There is also a significant portion of the younger voters who have a 30 second attention span and ‘believe’ what they hear in sound bites and are too lazy to actually go read (or search) for the real information.
I was talking to the gent next to me on the airplane and he’s pretty much decided if Obama wins, he will sell his business (if he can), and retire early. His comment, “I’ll be damned if I’m going to continue to work my ass off, just to have my taxes go up and that money go to people who think it’s their ‘right’ to get MY money for nothing!”
Can’t say I disagree with him…
Is a gun like a virus, a car, tobacco or alcohol? Yes say public health experts, who in the wake of recent mass shootings are calling for a fresh look at gun violence as a social disease.
What we need, they say, is a public health approach to the problem, like the highway safety measures, product changes and driving laws that slashed deaths from car crashes decades ago, even as the number of vehicles on the road rose.
One example: Guardrails are now curved to the ground instead of having sharp metal ends that stick out and pose a hazard in a crash.
“People used to spear themselves and we blamed the drivers for that,” said Dr. Garen Wintemute, an emergency medicine professor who directs the Violence Prevention Research Program at the University of California, Davis.
It wasn’t enough back then to curb deaths just by trying to make people better drivers, and it isn’t enough now to tackle gun violence by focusing solely on the people doing the shooting, he and other doctors say.
They want a science-based, pragmatic approach based on the reality that we live in a society saturated with guns and need better ways of preventing harm from them.
That’s just one aspect of a public health approach. Other elements:
–“Host” factors: What makes someone more likely to shoot, or someone more likely to be a victim. One recent study found firearm owners were more likely than those with no firearms at home to binge drink or to drink and drive, and other research has tied alcohol and gun violence. That suggests that people with driving under the influence convictions should be barred from buying a gun, Wintemute said.
Say what??? Binge drink if you’re a gun owner??? Drink and drive if you’re a gun owner???
–Product features: Which firearms are most dangerous and why. Manufacturers could be pressured to fix design defects that let guns go off accidentally, and to add technology that allows only the owner of the gun to fire it (many police officers and others are shot with their own weapons). Bans on assault weapons and multiple magazines that allow rapid and repeat firing are other possible steps.
Umm… Hasn’t that already happened??? And how many actually HAVE been shot with their own weapons??? Numbers??? and a ban on more than one magazine per weapon???
–“Environmental” risk factors: What conditions allow or contribute to shootings. Gun shops must do background checks and refuse to sell firearms to people convicted of felonies or domestic violence misdemeanors, but those convicted of other violent misdemeanors can buy whatever they want. The rules also don’t apply to private sales, which one study estimates as 40 percent of the market.
Again where did these numbers come from???
–Disease patterns, observing how a problem spreads. Gun ownership — a precursor to gun violence — can spread “much like an infectious disease circulates,” said Daniel Webster, a health policy expert and co-director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research in Baltimore.
Say WHAT??? If it’s a disease, then ever military man should be killing everybody they can shoot as they get older!!!
“There’s sort of a contagion phenomenon” after a shooting, where people feel they need to have a gun for protection or retaliation, he said.
Umm… Maybe because they might NEED it???
That’s already evident in the wake of the Colorado movie-theater shootings. Last week, reports popped up around the nation of people bringing guns to “Batman” movies. Some of them said they did so for protection.