There are days, and then there are DAYS…

Sometimes things don’t go quite as expected at work…

You know, little things like being out of coffee, the AC dying, the copier breaking at a critical time, the boss on a roll, minor little problems like that…

In the military however, when things go sideways, they can go in really ‘interesting’ directions!!!

Take off in perfectly good weather, get told to come back ASAP, and land in something like THIS…

This was in 2003, actually predicted by the weather guessers, and it literally shut air and most other operations down for a couple of days… Similar thing happened in GWI, with us racing a dust storm to land in Jedah…

And then there are the true Oh CRAP moments…

And the rest of the story is HERE.

What ever else it may be, life in the military is usually hours upon hours of boredom and moments of sheer terror…

h/t Stretch

And the Sequestration ‘ball’ just keeps rolling along…

At least for the military…

From SECDEF’s letter to the HASC and SASC… Bold is mine…

These serious adverse effects occur even if Congress provides flexibility in administering budget cuts and sequestration.  Flexibility in this instance would mean that Congress approves program cuts denied in the past and allows reallocation of funding, without regard to existing budget structures or limitations on transfer authority. However, the cuts are too steep and abrupt to be mitigated by flexibility, no matter how broadly defined.  These points are well illustrated by looking at the effects of a $52 billion cut in FY 2014:

•             With or without additional flexibility, the Department would not be able to substantially reduce military personnel costs in FY 2014 without draconian actions- a constraint that significantly worsens the pressure on other budgetary accounts and saves very little money upfront.

•             Sequestration in FY 2013 is severely damaging military readiness.  In FY 2014 the Depattment would seek to minimize cuts in the day-to-day operating costs most closely related to training and readiness.  Instead DoD would, for the second year in a row, impose hiring freezes and sharply reduce facilities maintenance­ sometimes leaving the Department with too few people to perform needed work or with employees working in substandard conditions.  The Department hopes to avoid a second year of furloughs of civilian persotmel, but DoD will have to consider involuntary reductions-in-force to reduce civilian personnel costs. However, these actions alone would not be sufficient.  Given a cut of $52 billion, even with flexibility in administration, training and overall readiness would at best remain constant at current low levels and, in some cases, would continue to decline.

•             The difficulty of substantially reducing military personnel funding in FY 2014 would likely require disproportionately large cuts in the Department’s investment accounts- assuming flexibility in implementing changes, cuts of 15 to 20 percent would be common.  The resulting marked slowdown in modernization  would reduce our long-term, critically important and historic technological superiority and undermine our better buying power initiatives.

•    The bottom line: with or without flexibility, administering a $52 billion cut would have severe and unacceptable effects.  In particular, if such a cut and the sequester mechanism were applied to military persotmel funding, DoD could accommodate the required reductions only by putting into place an extremely severe package of military personnel actions including halting all accessions, ending all permanent­ change-of-station moves, stopping discretionary bonuses, and freezing all promotions.

Part of the solution to the current budgetary impasse will require that Congress become a full partner in ending business-as-usual practices- in areas such as infrastructure, benefits and procurement- that would otherwise require further cuts to readiness, modernization and combat power.  We urgently need Congressional support in enacting difficult but necessary measures proposed by the President in his FY 2014 and prior budgets.  These include slowing growth in military pay raises in a matmer that still supports the all-volunteer force and raising fees for health care programs for retirees while still maintaining the generous benefits they deserve.  Other key initiatives include the retirement of some lower-priority weapons, including Navy ships and Air Force aircraft.  The Congress also needs to eliminate restrictions on the rate of the drawdown in military end strength for the Army and Marine Corps, permit the Department to end programs such as the C-27 aircraft, and enact other cost-saving proposals, such as a new BRAC round.  If Congress does not approve these proposals, even more cuts in combat power, readiness and modernization would be needed to accommodate cuts of $52 billion in FY 2014 and similar cuts in later years.

And this is the email I received that included a copy of the letter…

—– Original Message —–

From: Xxxxx

Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 01:16 PM

To: Me

Subject: Downsized!

Me,

Well, the other shoe fell this morning, after 11 years I’ve been downsized; since the company feels I’m making too much money and they don’t see business improving in the near term.  I was told they had to let “someone” go, and since I have a military retirement to quote fall back on unquote and due to my pay band I’m the sacrificial body for the department.  They stressed they will be happy to write me a great reference!  Called Xxxxx as soon as I could, she is not happy and wondering if she’s next.  Don’t know what we’re going to do now, as the loss of income is going to hurt badly and force dipping into the 401k way early if we stay here and I can’t find something.  Please let me know if you’re aware of anything out there in our field.

v/r

Xxxxxx

Another Monday…

This one is making the rounds of the mil-emails…  Something to think about…

trayvon stans

And that is the damn truth…

Since yesterday was all meetings, today was ‘supposed’ to be this…

ATT00043

However, THIS was more the reality…

dead at computer

Slogging through 150 pages of tech documents making comments does NOT make for a good day at the office…

A nose under the tent???

Or the whole damn camel???

Remember back in 2008 when Memphis used Section 8 vouchers to ‘move’ people out of the projects? Remember what happened to the crime rates/locations/statistics???

Article on the report HERE.

Guess what…

HHS is trying to take this national… Proposed ruling is HERE.

The section that got my attention (and a few others that emailed it to me) is this:

Summary of the Major Provisions of the Rule

The proposed rule—in concert with other HUD policies—is structured to provide direction, guidance, and procedures for program participants to promote fair housing choice. The rule promotes these objectives and responds to the GAO’s observations by:

a. Refining the current requirement that program participants complete an Analysis of Impediments (AI) with a more effective and standardized Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH), through which program participants would evaluate fair housing challenges and goals using regional and national benchmarks and data tools to facilitate the measurements of trends and changes over time;

b. Improving fair housing assessment, planning, and decision-making by providing data that program participants must consider in their AFHs, thereby aiding program participants establish fair housing goals to address these issues and concerns;

c. Incorporating, explicitly, fair housing planning into existing planning processes, the consolidated plan and PHA Annual Plan, which in turn incorporates fair housing priorities and concerns more effectively into housing, community development, land-use, and other decision-making that influences how communities and regions grow and develop;

d. Encouraging and facilitating regional approaches to addressing fair housing issues, including effective incentives for collaboration across jurisdictions and PHAs, and incorporation of fair housing planning into regionally significant undertakings, such as major public infrastructure investments;

e. Bringing people historically excluded because of characteristics protected by the Fair Housing Act into full and fair participation in decisions about the appropriate uses of HUD funds and other investments, through a requirement to conduct community participation as an integral part of program participants’ AFHs; and

f. Establishing an approach to affirmatively further fair housing that calls for coordinated efforts to combat illegal housing discrimination, so that individuals and families can make decisions about where to live, free from discrimination, with necessary information regarding housing options, and with adequate support to make their choices viable.

Through these improvements, the rule seeks to make program participants more empowered to foster the diversity and strength of communities and regions by improving integrated living patterns and overcoming historic patterns of segregation, reducing racial and ethnic concentrations of poverty, and responding to identified disproportionate housing needs of persons protected by the Fair Housing Act. The rule also seeks to assist program participants in reducing disparities in access to key community assets based on race, color, religion, sex, familial status, national origin, or disability, thereby improving economic competitiveness and quality of life.

And if that isn’t enough to get your attention, there is THIS speech given by Secretary Shaun Donovan Before the NAACP’s 104th Annual Convention last week…

And this is the takeaway quote- (Bold and underline are mine)

Specifically, this new rule will:

• provide a clear definition of what it means to affirmatively further fair housing;

• outline a standard framework with well-defined parameters; and

• offer targeted guidance and assistance to help grantees complete this assessment.

Perhaps most important—for the first time ever—HUD is providing data for every neighborhood in the nation, detailing what access African American families, and other members of protected classes, have to the community assets I talked about earlier –  including jobs, schools and transit.

With this data and the improved AFFH process, we can expand access to high opportunity neighborhoods and draw attention to investment possibilities in underserved communities.

Make no mistake: this is a big deal.  With the HUD budget alone, we are talking about billions of dollars.  And as you know, decades ago, these funds were used to support discrimination. Now, they will be used to expand opportunity and bring communities closer to the American Dream.

This rule change is something the NAACP has long called for.  And when you’ve spoken, we’ve listened.  We have been proud to work with stakeholders like you every step of the way.  And we will continue to in order to strengthen this work in the months and years ahead to bring Fair Housing into the 21st century. 

Note that Donovan ONLY calls out African-Americans, I can’t help but wonder if this is a slip of the tongue or on purpose. I guess Hispanics, asians, and low income whites won’t qualify…

Remember how we were talking about if they couldn’t legislate it, this administration would regulate it???  Well, here’s another ‘regulation’ that is going to get crammed down our throats…

What’s next???

Sequestration- It’s ONLY for the military…

My first rifle…

I got a chance to get to my first rifle, and figured I’d put up a few pics…

I received this one in 1959 when I was eight.

It’s a Stevens Crack Shot 26, made sometime after 1913. Not sure what year it was actually bought and brought into the family, that is lost in the mists of time.  I was told I was the third one in the family to get it. It has an 18 inch barrel, and the stock has never been cut. It also has fixed iron sights, and was pretty damn accurate!!!

Stevens 4

I know I put literally thousands of rounds through it over the next four+ years, and I remember paying something like $.50 a box for 50 rounds of .22 long (that is a BUNCH of coke bottles, etc. at $.02 a bottle)… It got much better when I started mowing lawns at age 11, I was RICH! I think I was getting $3 a yard…

Stevens 3

It is a falling block, takedown version with the 22 barrel bored off center so the firing pin will strike the rim of the 22LR cartridge on its lower edge.  My conjecture is that off center drilling allowed the placement of the firing pin in the falling block to allow a center fire version to be made without having to re-design any parts of the action,  Since I’ve never seen one of the old Stevens 25-20, I don’t know if that is true or not…

Stevens 1

But if you look at this picture, you’ll note the 22 long rifle designation is in larger alphanumeric that the rest of the roll mark…

Stevens 2

This one is not real pretty, as I beat the hell out of it as a kid. I know I dropped it in a couple of creeks, and I’m pretty sure I dropped it out of a tree at least once…

But, having said that, I killed a many a can with this thing, and quite a few (well a few) squirrels and a bunch of frogs over the years…

And this is really what I credit with my ability as a rifle shooter, is all the time I spent in the fields and woods with this little rifle… Eventually it will go to my grandson after I get the sear replaced (I’ve worn it down to a hair trigger, and I DO mean hair trigger)…

The things one sees…

 

And a look back toward the cave entrance…

 

And one from the duty free…

Japanese toilet 1

You too can now own a Japanese remote control toilet lid- It washes, it waxes, it blow dries…

All for only $798…

Idiots and assholes…

This won’t be up to one of JayG’s epic rants, but DAMN I’m getting tired of the idiots and assholes out there on the roads these days…

To whit- Van and BMW drivers…

WTF people do you ‘think’ you OWN the damn road?  My perspective, I’m to the point that I believe all the Bimmer crowd are a bunch of wanna be’s…

Cause they are driving a ‘German Luxury Car’, they think they can do anything they want, run stop lights, run up the shoulder and/or cut people off (because nobody will hit their expensive car), double park in the right lane because they are too ‘important’ to actually drive around the corner to the parking lot… Gah…

And just because you happen to be female and blonde, it DON’T make you special either… (unless she really should have been riding the short bus, or all that dye has impacted the frontal lobe).  And flipping me the bird and screaming at me because I wouldn’t let you cut in is NOT going to make me any friendlier toward you…

But I DID smile when you had to slam on your brakes to keep from hitting that barrel…

And vans!!!

When you have so much crap that you can’t see out the back window, and you’ve got more crap tied on top, and two coolers on one of those bumper hitch racks, and your ass is dragging the ground because you’re over the max gross for the vehicle (Hell, between you and your hubby in the front seat, you’re ALREADY over max gross), and Precious in the back seat is throwing stuff at every passing car (I didn’t know they made bloomers THAT large); YOU are not the only person on the interstate…

Weaving between lanes, straddling the center line or blindly cutting across three lanes to almost get to the exit ramp is NOT going to endear you to the folks that had to lock up the brakes, especially the 18 wheeler that had to take the shoulder because of your stupidity…

Nor is turning around to hold a conversation/chew your kids butts that are sitting in the back seat.  Much less fumbling around in the floorboard to get that 32oz coke that you dropped, while simultaneously slamming on the brakes and did you notice you changed lanes?  Didn’t think so…

And the NY asshole in the fancy Giants van, be glad I didn’t knock your ass into next week… Dropping off into the median at 75 mph was NOT what I wanted to do but when you ran up the slow lane because you just couldn’t wait your turn, and cut across my bumper to get around the ‘slow’ car that was actually doing 5 over, you left me no choice other than the PIT maneuver; which I seriously considered…

And yes “I” was the one that called the troopers on your ass; and yes, “I” was the one that honked at your pulled over ass, and gave the trooper a thumbs up!

Oh, and can’t forget the MA and NJ asshats in vans that think 6 feet of separation is adequate at 75-80 miles an hour and if there is 8 feet you’re gonna cut in; and those that cut across the 18 wheeler’s noses to get one more car length ahead…

Trust me you will NOT be mourned when you become the bug on the wheeler’s windshield, I will feel sorry for the driver, but NOT for you, not at all…

I really need a 57 Desoto… Then let em try that crap…

Drones???

Although  still in early development stage a sign of  things to come

Mosquito drone

Is this  a mosquito? No. It’s an insect spy drone for urban areas, already in production, funded by  the US Government (can we say DARPA)…

It can  be remotely controlled and is equipped with a camera and a microphone.

It can land on you, and it may have the potential to take a DNA sample or leave RFID tracking nanotechnology on your skin. It can  fly through an open window, or it can attach to your clothing until you take it in your home.

Given their propensity to request macro-sized drones  for surveillance, one is left with little doubt  that police and military may look into these gadgets next.

And now you know why our government has requested  the law be changed to allow drone surveillance  in the United States…